US District Court for the District of Colorado Prisoner Petitions Cases

Cases filed
Cases 91 - 100 of 12,527
Mullins v. President of the United States of America
as 1:2020cv02451
Defendant: President of the United States of America
Plaintiff: Joshua Burley Mullins
Cause Of Action: Prisoner Civil Rights
Mullins v. Country of China, The
as 1:2020cv02447
Defendant: Country of China, The
Plaintiff: Joshua Burley Mullins
Cause Of Action: Prisoner Civil Rights
Slater v. Pacheco et al
as 1:2020cv02421
Defendant: Paul Pacheco, Wilbanks, Shane Kolander and others
Plaintiff: Charles Slater, III
Cause Of Action: Civil Rights Act
Mullins v. No Named Defendants
as 1:2020cv02435
Defendant: No Named Defendants
Plaintiff: Joshua Burley Mullins
Cause Of Action: Prisoner Civil Rights
Ackerman v. Greilick
as 1:2020cv02431
Respondent: B. Greilick
Petitioner: Edwin Mark Ackerman
Cause Of Action: - Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Brunsting v. Long et al
as 1:2020cv02436
Respondent: Jeff Long, Attorney General, The
Petitioner: Lance Brunsting
Cause Of Action: - Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Carr v. The People of the State of Colorado
as 1:2020cv02417
Plaintiff: Heshimo Carr
Defendant: The People of the State of Colorado
Cause Of Action: Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Benedetti v. Richardson et al
as 1:2020cv02419
Defendant: Christopher Richardson, Elizabeth Stovall, Jefferson Combined Court
Plaintiff: Jeff A Benedetti
Cause Of Action: Prisoner Civil Rights
Newton v. USA
as 1:2020cv02432
Respondent: USA
Petitioner: Blake Aaron Newton
Cause Of Action: Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Miller v. Iowa Department of Corrections et al
as 1:2020cv02408
Petitioner: Christopher Lee Miller
Respondent: Elbert County District Court, State of Colorado, Iowa Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?