US District Court for the District of Columbia Contract Cases

Negotiable Instrument Cases, Dockets and Filings
Cases filed
Cases 31 - 40 of 66
ICS NETT, INC. v. APEX GROUP OF COMPANIES, et al
as 1:2013cv00212
Plaintiff: ICS NETT, INC.
Defendant: APEX GROUP OF COMPANIES and LUTFE HASSAN
Cause Of Action: 12 U.S.C. § 1821 Default of Loan by Promissary Note
CITIBANK, N.A. v. BURK & REEDY
as 1:2013cv00166
Plaintiff: CITIBANK, N.A.
Defendant: BURK & REEDY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Negotiable Instrument
MEYER et al v. KALUCHA
as 1:2012cv01914
Plaintiff: THOMAS MEYER and CAROL BASILE
Defendant: VINEET KALUCHA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Negotiable Instrument
BANK OF GEORGETOWN v. PERSAUD COMPANIES, INC. et al
as 1:2012cv01614
Plaintiff: BANK OF GEORGETOWN
Defendant: PERSAUD COMPANIES, INC. and ANDREW C. PERSAUD
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Negotiable Instrument
WOYEVODSKY v. BRUCH et al
as 1:2012cv01509
Defendant: PETER BRUCH and LAURIE ANDERSON-BRUCH
Plaintiff: XENIA WOYEVODSKY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
1020 MONROE LLC et al v. SUNTRUST BANK, INC.
as 1:2012cv00573
Plaintiff: 1020 MONROE LLC and SIAMAK MADANI
Defendant: SUNTRUST BANK, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
SNELBECKER v. SIBLEY
as 1:2011cv02282
Plaintiff: JANICE SNELBECKER
Defendant: DONNA SIBLEY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
BANK OF AMERICA, N.A. v. CAMALIER et al
as 1:2011cv01434
Plaintiff: BANK OF AMERICA, N.A.
Defendant: F. DAVIS CAMALIER , F. DAVIS CAMALIER FAMILY TRUST and WASHINGTON NEW YORK CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
WELLS FARGO, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION v. BOOKER
as 1:2011cv01389
Plaintiff: WELLS FARGO BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION
Defendant: JANICE LILLIAN BOOKER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
SECURITY NATIONAL BANK OF OMAHA v. HOTZ
as 1:2011cv00694
Plaintiff: SECURITY NATIONAL BANK OF OMAHA
Defendant: THOMAS G. HOTZ
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?