US District Court for the District of Columbia Intellectual Property Cases
Cases 41 - 50 of 236
CASE NUMBER NOT USED
as 1:2020cv03079
Plaintiff:
Mr. Andy Ye Bang and NO PARTY
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 44
INTERNATIONAL COUNCIL OF SHOPPING CENTERS, INC.v. RECONCRE, LLC
as 1:2020cv02551
Defendant:
RECONCRE, LLC
Plaintiff:
International Council of Shopping Centers, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125
TITAN TITLE, LLC v. TITAN TITLE GROUP LLC
as 1:2020cv02343
Defendant:
TITAN TITLE GROUP LLC
Plaintiff:
TITAN TITLE, LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125
ADAMS, NASH & HASKELL, INC. v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 1:2020cv01916
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Plaintiff:
ADAMS, NASH & HASKELL, INC.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1114
EMPLOYMENT LAW GROUP, P.C. v. SAN DIEGO EMPLOYMENT LAW GROUP
as 1:2020cv01852
Plaintiff:
THE EMPLOYMENT LAW GROUP, P.C. and EMPLOYMENT LAW GROUP, P.C.
Defendant:
SAN DIEGO EMPLOYMENT LAW GROUP
Petitioner:
DENNIS BRADY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1338
HOFFMAN v. STATE REGULATORY REGISTRY LLC (SRR) et al
as 1:2020cv01493
Defendant:
HOMAYOUN RANJIJIFROODY, LOANSMARTER INC., STATE REGULATORY REGISTRY LLC (SRR) and others
Plaintiff:
DAVID E. HOFFMAN, JR.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
MORTGAGE BANKERS ASSOCIATION v. METROTEX ASSOCIATION OF REALTORS, INC.
as 1:2020cv00918
Defendant:
Metrotex Association of Realtors, Inc.
Plaintiff:
MORTGAGE BANKERS ASSOCIATION
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125
GAME PLAN,INC. v. NIKE INC. et al
as 1:2020cv00455
Defendant:
UNINTERRUPTED, LLC, TAKE-TWO INTERACTIVE SOFTWARE, INC., WALT DISNEY COMPANY and others
Plaintiff:
GAME, INC. PLAN and GAME PLAN, INC.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1114
RESTORAPET, INC. v. RESTORACBD, LLC
as 1:2020cv00319
Plaintiff:
Restorapet, Inc.
Defendant:
RestoraCBD, LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1114
CASE NUMBER NOT USED
as 1:2019cv03502
Plaintiff:
HYUNDAI MOTOR AMERICA, HYUNDAI MOTOR COMPANY and NO PARTY
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
