US District Court for the District of Columbia Torts - Injury Cases
Cases 31 - 40 of 525
NEMBOT v. ALVARDO LOPEZ
as 1:2023cv02600
Plaintiff:
DIEUNEDORT NEMBOT
Defendant:
HERSON ALVARDO LOPEZ
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Auto Negligence
WASHINGTON METROPOLITAN AREA TRANSIT AUTHORITY v. BELAY et al
as 1:2023cv02590
Plaintiff:
WASHINGTON METROPOLITAN AREA TRANSIT AUTHORITY
Defendant:
ABAINEH BELAY and PAK-AMERICAN CORP. doing business as DEMOCRACY CAB
KAMGA TUEKAM et al v. MENDOZA GONZALEZ
as 1:2023cv02488
Plaintiff:
DORIS KAMGA TUEKAM, GERMAINE GLADYS NGOUMENI WANSI and ALAIN MOUAFO MBASSAH
Defendant:
LAURA STEFFANIE MENDOZA GONZALEZ
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1396 - Tort Negligence
BARUA v. STITT et al
as 1:2023cv02358
Plaintiff:
UTSHAB R. BARUA
Defendant:
JAMES STITT and RODERICK STITT
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Auto Negligence
FORD-YOUNG v. WASHINGTON METROPOLITAN AREA TRANSIT AUTHORITY
as 1:2023cv02272
Plaintiff:
Jemelle Ford-Young
Defendant:
WASHINGTON METROPOLITAN AREA TRANSIT AUTHORITY and JOHN DOE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Personal Injury
RIOS v. HEGER et al
as 1:2023cv02187
Plaintiff:
GERALDINE RIOS
Defendant:
FRED M. HEGER and VALLEY INTERIORS, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Tort/Motor Vehicle (P.I.)
TESITOR v. WASHINGTON METROPOLITAN AREA TRANSIT AUTHORITY
as 1:2023cv01878
Plaintiff:
CHARLES TESITOR
Defendant:
WASHINGTON METROPOLITAN AREA TRANSIT AUTHORITY
COOK v. WASHINGTON METROPOLITAN AREA TRANSIT AUTHORITY
as 1:2023cv01864
Plaintiff:
TREVON COOK
Defendant:
WASHINGTON METROPOLITAN AREA TRANSIT AUTHORITY
SAWYER v. REY-CUBILLOS et al
as 1:2023cv01722
Plaintiff:
LILY SAWYER
Defendant:
RODRIGO ARTURO REY-CUBILLOS and HANN & HANN, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Auto Negligence
KWAK v. SINCLAIR
as 1:2023cv01663
Plaintiff:
NO UN KWAK
Defendant:
KRISTIN SINCLAIR
Cause Of Action: 23 U.S.C. § 134 P.I.- Auto Negligence
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
