US District Court for the Middle District of Florida Contract Cases
Cases 51 - 60 of 135
Singh v. Prasad et al
as 6:2013cv01076
Plaintiff:
Ramakant Singh
Defendant:
Sanjay Prasad and Universal System Technologies, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal--Other Contract
Jason v. Li et al
as 8:2013cv00831
Plaintiff:
Joseph M. Jason
Defendant:
Jingsong Li, Xuefeng Guo, Weihong Xia and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 fd Diversity-Breach of Fiduciary Duty
Craft et al v. Pulte Home Corporation
as 6:2013cv00264
Plaintiff:
Jerry Craft and Jessica Craft
Defendant:
Pulte Home Corporation
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 0077 Securities Fraud
Fields v. Pulte Home Corporation
as 6:2013cv00268
Plaintiff:
Winifred Fields
Defendant:
Pulte Home Corporation
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 0077 Securities Fraud
Fakadej et al v. Pulte Home Corporation
as 6:2013cv00266
Plaintiff:
Kimberly Fakadej and Richard Fakadej
Defendant:
Pulte Home Corporation
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 0077 Securities Fraud
Sundaresan et al v. Pulte Home Corporation
as 6:2013cv00282
Plaintiff:
Peruvembra Sundaresan and Gloria Sundaresan
Defendant:
Pulte Home Corporation
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 0077 Securities Fraud
Denoia v. Pulte Home Corporation
as 6:2013cv00265
Plaintiff:
Joseph Denoia
Defendant:
Pulte Home Corporation
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 0077 Securities Fraud
Ramdowe et al v. Pulte Home Corporation
as 6:2013cv00278
Plaintiff:
Krishnadat Ike Ramdowe and Ganmattee Ramdowe
Defendant:
Pulte Home Corporation
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 0077 Securities Fraud
Pulmano v. Pulte Home Corporation
as 6:2013cv00276
Plaintiff:
Marilou Pulmano
Defendant:
Pulte Home Corporation
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 0077 Securities Fraud
Hui v. Pulte Homes Corporation
as 6:2013cv00271
Plaintiff:
Muk Sum Hui
Defendant:
Pulte Home Corporation
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 0077 Securities Fraud
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
