US District Court for the Northern District of Florida Civil Rights Cases
Cases 21 - 30 of 7,261
EVANS v. ARCH
as 3:2024cv00127
Plaintiff:
ROGER VON EVANS
Defendant:
CAREN L ARCH
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
LOPER v. VALENCIA et al
as 1:2024cv00051
Plaintiff:
GABRIEL LOPER
Defendant:
JOVANT VALENCIA, DEAN WATSON, CLINT ANDERSON and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv00136
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00120
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 621 Job Discrimination (Age)
FIGG et al v. FEDERAL HIGHWAY ADMINISTRATION et al
as 4:2024cv00129
Plaintiff:
LINDA FIGG, FIGG GROUP INC, FIGG BRIDGE INSPECTION INC and others
Defendant:
FEDERAL HIGHWAY ADMINISTRATION and HARI KALLA
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
THOMPSON v. UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE et al
as 4:2024cv00128
Plaintiff:
BRUCE THOMPSON
Defendant:
UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE, ACCOUNTING SERVICE CENTER, AMAZON.COM INC and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
DILMORE v. CITY OF QUINCY
as 4:2024cv00127
Plaintiff:
STACY DILMORE
Defendant:
CITY OF QUINCY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv00126
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601 Family and Medical Leave Act
MCKENZIE v. REGIESTER
as 5:2024cv00057
Plaintiff:
TABITHA MCKENZIE
Defendant:
TIMOTHY REGIESTER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv00121
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
