US District Court for the Northern District of Florida Prisoner Petitions Cases
Cases 31 - 40 of 5,240
COBURN v. STATE OF FLORIDA
as 5:2024cv00035
Petitioner:
PALMER EDWARD COBURN
Respondent:
STATE OF FLORIDA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
RINKINS v. SECRETARY DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
as 4:2024cv00056
Petitioner:
MICHAEL J RINKINS
Respondent:
SECRETARY DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
DIAZ v. DIXON
as 5:2024cv00034
Petitioner:
REINALDO DIAZ
Respondent:
RICKY D DIXON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
LYNN v. DIXON
as 4:2024cv00055
Petitioner:
HENRY LYNN
Respondent:
RICKY DIXON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
BREADON v. HEWETT
as 4:2024cv00046
Petitioner:
EMANUEL BREADON
Respondent:
WARDEN HEWETT
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
KING v. STATE OF FLORIDA
as 5:2024cv00022
Petitioner:
DARREN TARRELL KING
Respondent:
STATE OF FLORIDA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
HUTCHINSON v. STATE OF FLORIDA
as 1:2024cv00015
Petitioner:
JALEN HUTCHINSON and JALEN MICHAEL CHRISTO HUTCHINSON
Respondent:
STATE OF FLORIDA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
CONRAD v. FCI MARIANNA
as 5:2024cv00020
Petitioner:
DAVID CONRAD
Respondent:
FCI MARIANNA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
INGMIRE v. ROBINSON
as 3:2024cv00033
Petitioner:
CHARLES D INGMIRE, II
Respondent:
COLEMAN L ROBINSON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
POOLE v. FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
as 4:2024cv00023
Petitioner:
CURTIS WEDO POOLE
Respondent:
FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS and RICKY DIXON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
