US District Court for the District of Idaho Other Statutes Cases
Cases 11 - 20 of 29
Joe Hand Promotions, Inc v. Jenkins et al
as 1:2012cv00270
Plaintiff:
Joe Hand Promotions, Inc
Defendant:
Jefferson M. Jenkins and JMJ Designs, LLC
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 605
J&J Sports Productions, Inc. v. Morfin et al
as 4:2012cv00258
Plaintiff:
J&J Sports Productions, Inc.
Defendant:
Erika Morfin and Salvador Morfin
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 605
J&J Sports Productions, Inc. v. Contreras et al
as 4:2012cv00257
Plaintiff:
J&J Sports Productions, Inc.
Defendant:
Enrique F. Contreras and Ana M. Contreras
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 605
Joe Hand Promotions, Inc v. Beaudoin et al
as 2:2012cv00128
Plaintiff:
Joe Hand Promotions, Inc
Defendant:
Wendy Beaudoin, Dave Beaudoin and Lakeview Inn Enterprises Inc
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 605
DISH Network L.L.C. et al v. Martin
as 1:2012cv00124
Plaintiff:
DISH Network L.L.C. , Echostar Technologies L.L.C. and Nagrastar L.L.C.
Defendant:
Robert Martin
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 605
J&J Sports Productions, Inc. v. Aburto
as 4:2012cv00125
Plaintiff:
J&J Sports Productions, Inc.
Defendant:
Debra Aburto
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 605
Joe Hand Promotions, Inc. v. Frei et al
as 4:2012cv00123
Plaintiff:
Joe Hand Promotions, Inc.
Defendant:
Richard T. Frei and Deborah A. Frei
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 605
J&J Sports Productions, Inc. v. Frei et al
as 4:2012cv00127
Plaintiff:
J&J Sports Productions, Inc.
Defendant:
Richard T. Frei and Deborah A. Frei
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 605
Joe Hand Promotions, Inc v. Godsill
as 4:2012cv00074
Plaintiff:
Joe Hand Promotions, Inc
Defendant:
Robert E Godsill, Jr
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 605
J&J Sports Productions, Inc. v. Pedraza et al
as 4:2012cv00072
Plaintiff:
J&J Sports Productions, Inc.
Defendant:
Rocio Maria Pedraza and Olga Minereva Chavez
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 605
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
