US District Court for the Central District of Illinois Prisoner Petitions Cases
Cases 11 - 20 of 788
McCray v. Donathan et al
as 4:2024cv04050
Plaintiff:
Leonardo McCray
Defendant:
Greg Donathan and Cody Waterkotte
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Wilkerson v. Avalos et al
as 4:2024cv04047
Plaintiff:
David Wilkerson
Defendant:
. Avalos, . Sheaff and . Goodman
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bakalik v. Drug Cartel et al
as 4:2024cv04044
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Bakalik
Defendant:
Drug Cartel, ISIS-Hamas-Boko Haram-Others Unnamed, Sex Traffickers - Sex Offenders and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Penton v. Lodge et al
as 4:2024cv04040
Plaintiff:
Jordan Penton
Defendant:
Paula Lodge, Vipin Shah, Shan Jumper and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Simmons v. Hogan et al
as 4:2024cv04035
Plaintiff:
Jake Simmons
Defendant:
Heather Hogan and John Doe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
McCray v. Donathan et al
as 4:2024cv04034
Plaintiff:
Leonardo McCray
Defendant:
Greg Donathan, Erin Posey, Sandra Ham and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Moore v. Donathan et al
as 4:2024cv04025
Plaintiff:
Allen Moore
Defendant:
Greg Donathan, Erin Posey, Sandra Simpson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bolden v. Raoul et al
as 4:2024cv04024
Plaintiff:
Donnell Bolden
Defendant:
Kwame Raoul, Heidi Epperson, Elaine Bochenek and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Sullivan v. Aramark Food Services Corp et al
as 4:2024cv04019
Plaintiff:
Anthony Sullivan
Defendant:
Aramark Food Services Corp, . Coates, . Kuldfelt and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Penter v. Hogan et al
as 4:2024cv04011
Plaintiff:
Harold Penter
Defendant:
. Hogan, . Shah and Mary Becker
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
