US District Court for the Central District of Illinois Labor Cases
Cases 171 - 180 of 184
Murray et al v. Tyson Foods Inc
as 4:2008cv04001
Plaintiff:
John Murray, John Murray, John Murray and others
Defendant:
Tyson Foods Inc
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
North v. Board of Trustees of Illinois State University et al
as 1:2007cv01220
Plaintiff:
Jill L North
Defendant:
Board of Trustees of Illinois State University and C Alvin Bowman
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Chao v. Topa Inc et al
as 2:2007cv02136
Plaintiff:
Elaine L Chao and Elaine L Chao
Defendant:
Topa Inc and Atta Toghraee
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Denial of Overtime Compensation
Keef v. M.A. Mortenson Company et al
as 1:2007cv01183
Plaintiff:
David Keef
Defendant:
M.A. Mortenson Company and Does 1-10
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Somasekharan et al v. Lawrence & Associates Inc
as 2:2007cv02087
Plaintiff:
Sreekumar Somasekharan, Sreekumar Somasekharan, Sreekumar Somasekharan and others
Defendant:
Lawrence & Associates Inc, Lawrence & Associates Inc, Lawrence & Associates Inc and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
Poepsel v. C.H. Robinson Worldwide Inc.
as 1:2007cv01101
Plaintiff:
Heidi Poepsel, Heidi Poepsel and Heidi Poepsel
Defendant:
C.H. Robinson Worldwide Inc., C.H. Robinson Worldwide Inc., C.H. Robinson Worldwide Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Denial of Overtime Compensation
Chao v. Fiesta Ranchera of Illinois, Inc. et al
as 1:2006cv01322
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Denial of Overtime Compensation
Chao v. Fiesta Ranchera of Bloomington, Inc. et al
as 1:2006cv01323
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Denial of Overtime Compensation
Chao v. Fiesta Ranchera of West Bloomington, Inc et al
as 1:2006cv01321
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Denial of Overtime Compensation
Chao v. La Fiesta of Canton, Inc. et al
as 1:2006cv01324
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Denial of Overtime Compensation
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
