US District Court for the Northern District of Illinois Torts - Injury Cases
Cases 71 - 80 of 280
Akbar v. Kale et al
as 1:2015cv07999
Plaintiff:
Jamal A. Akbar
Defendant:
Scott Kale, Liana Placci and Betty L. Rivers
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Von De Bur v. Union Pacific Railroad Company
as 3:2015cv50176
Plaintiff:
David E. Von De Bur
Defendant:
Union Pacific Railroad Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Schmitt v. National Railroad Passenger Corporation
as 1:2015cv05270
Plaintiff:
Anthony Schmitt
Defendant:
National Railroad Passenger Corporation
Cause Of Action: 45 U.S.C. § 51
Willett v. Chicago Terminal Railroad Company
as 1:2015cv02038
Plaintiff:
Michael Willett
Defendant:
Chicago Terminal Railroad Company
Cause Of Action: 45 U.S.C. § 51
Blake
as 1:2015cv01106
Plaintiff:
Mitchell Blake
Defendant:
Union Pacific Railroad Company , Professional Transportation, Inc. , Reginald A Hooks and others
Counter_claimant:
Union Pacific Railroad Company , Professional Transportation, Inc. and Reginald A Hooks
Counter_defendant:
Brittany J Ackerman
Cause Of Action: 45 U.S.C. § 51
Kelly v. National Railroad Passenger Corporation
as 1:2014cv09839
Plaintiff:
Carl Kelly
Defendant:
National Railroad Passenger Corporation
Cause Of Action: 45 U.S.C. § 51
Manjarres v. BNSF Railway Company
as 1:2014cv08346
Plaintiff:
Eduardo Manjarres
Defendant:
BNSF Railway Company
Cause Of Action: 45 U.S.C. § 51
Levine v. The Boeing Company
as 1:2014cv07587
Plaintiff:
Seymour Levine
Defendant:
The Boeing Company
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 145
Doolan v. BNSF Railway Company
as 1:2014cv06692
Plaintiff:
Mathew Doolan
Defendant:
BNSF Railway Company
Cause Of Action: 45 U.S.C. § 51
Shanahan v. Northeast Illinois Regional Commuter Railroad Corporation
as 1:2014cv06342
Plaintiff:
Robert Shanahan
Defendant:
Northeast Illinois Regional Commuter Railroad Corporation
Cause Of Action: 45 U.S.C. § 51
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
