US District Court for the Northern District of Illinois Torts - Injury Cases
Cases 41 - 50 of 113
Beaty v. Ford Motor Company
as 1:2016cv03917
Defendant:
Ford Motor Company
Plaintiff:
Beaty and Douglas Beaty
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Motor Vehicle Product Liability
Anderson v. Ford Motor Company
as 1:2016cv01632
Plaintiff:
Anderson, Danielle Anderson, Michael Murphy and others
Defendant:
Ford Motor Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Motor Vehicle Product Liability
Jeter v. Trinidad
as 1:2015cv11144
Plaintiff:
Matthew Jeter
Defendant:
George J. Trinidad
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Thompson v. Takata Corporation et al
as 1:2015cv08947
Plaintiff:
Geri Thompson
Defendant:
Takata Corporation, TK Holdings, Inc. and Chrysler Motors LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Bryden v. General Motors LLC
as 1:2015cv01457
Plaintiff:
Linda Bryden
Defendant:
General Motors LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
HD Transportation Inc. et al v. Navistar, Inc.
as 1:2015cv00583
Plaintiff:
HD Transportation Inc. and Dennis Phelus
Defendant:
Navistar Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Kesse v. Ford Motor Company
as 1:2014cv06265
Plaintiff:
John A. Kesse
Defendant:
Ford Motor Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Motor Vehicle Product Liability
Hess v. Zimmer, Inc. et al
as 1:2014cv03528
Plaintiff:
Christine L. Hess
Defendant:
Zimmer, Inc., Zimmer Holdings, Inc. and Zimmer Orthopaedic Surgical Products, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Scott v. Toyota Motor Corporation
as 1:2013cv08927
Plaintiff:
Patricia Scott
Defendant:
Toyota Motor Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Schuring et al v. Cottrell, Inc. et al
as 1:2013cv07142
Defendant:
Cottrell, Inc. and Cassens Transport Company
Plaintiff:
Gregory Schuring and Mary Schuring
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Petition for Removal
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
