US District Court for the Northern District of Illinois Civil Rights Cases
Cases 11 - 20 of 28,866
Boyer v. Advanced Correctional Healthcare, Inc
as 1:2024cv03169
Plaintiff:
Gregory Boyer
Defendant:
Advanced Correctional Healthcare, Inc
Cross Defendant:
Gallagher Bassett Services Inc.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv03140
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Sex)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv03170
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv03177
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451 Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv03148
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv03115
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
REBEKAH v. CHICAGO PUBLIC MEDIA
as 1:2024cv03137
Plaintiff:
VILLEGA REBEKAH
Defendant:
CHICAGO PUBLIC MEDIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451 Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv50152
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question
Sorrell v. Garcia et al
as 1:2024cv03099
Plaintiff:
Jimmy Sorrell
Defendant:
Julio Garcia, Donald Cunningham and Village of University Park
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Weinhaus v. Scannicchio et al
as 1:2024cv03061
Plaintiff:
Edward "Coach" Weinhaus
Defendant:
Regina A Scannicchio and Illinois Judges Association
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
