US District Court for the Northern District of Illinois Prisoner Petitions Cases
Cases 81 - 90 of 23,719
Whitmore v. Davis et al
as 1:2024cv02136
Plaintiff:
Troy D. Whitmore
Defendant:
Ronald L. Davis, Michael Downey, Kolitwenzew and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Profit v. Tuell et al
as 3:2024cv50102
Plaintiff:
Shaun Profit
Defendant:
Susan Tuell, Merrill Zahtz, Larry Sy and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jones v. Mershon et al
as 3:2024cv50099
Plaintiff:
Sam Jones
Defendant:
Kristina Mershon and M. Carpenter
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jones v. Gallegos et al
as 3:2024cv50100
Plaintiff:
Sam Jones
Defendant:
Gallegos and Linboom
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lewis v. Dart et al
as 1:2024cv02068
Plaintiff:
Kyle Bernard Lewis
Defendant:
Thomas J. Dart and John Doe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Phillips v. Strack et al
as 1:2024cv02100
Plaintiff:
Dezzan D. Phillips
Defendant:
Daina Strack, Ben Slocum, Jason Edgecomb and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Borders v. Gomez et al
as 1:2024cv02070
Plaintiff:
Jeremy Borders
Defendant:
David Gomez, LT. Norris, LT. Krewer and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
O'Quinn v. Tuell et al
as 3:2024cv50096
Plaintiff:
Chester O'Quinn
Defendant:
Tuell, Sy and Tarry Williams
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Campbell v. Mayor of Robbins Illinois et al
as 1:2024cv02097
Plaintiff:
David Campbell
Defendant:
Mayor of Robbins Illinois, Chief of Police and Sharon Dyson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Howard v. County Of Cook et al
as 1:2024cv02106
Plaintiff:
Jamayle Howard
Defendant:
County Of Cook, Thomas Dart and Concepcion
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
