US District Court for the Northern District of Indiana Prisoner Petitions Cases
Cases 11 - 20 of 11,254
Sneed v. Brown
as 2:2024cv00129
Plaintiff:
Aaron C. Sneed
Defendant:
Brown
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hancock v. Williams et al
as 3:2024cv00294
Plaintiff:
Ryan Cole Hancock
Defendant:
Erin Williams, Marla Doughman and J Smiley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Henry v. USA
as 1:2024cv00143
Petitioner:
Adam Henry
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Brown v. Warden
as 2:2024cv00119
Petitioner:
Terrance Brown and Terrance A Brown
Respondent:
Warden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Kirkland v. Ombudsman Bureau et al
as 3:2024cv00286
Defendant:
Centuerion Health, Charlene A Burkett, English and others
Plaintiff:
Martize Kirkland
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jackson v. Galipeau et al
as 3:2024cv00290
Plaintiff:
Darnell D Jackson
Defendant:
John Galipeau, Jason Smiley, Adam Leidy and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Carter v. Miami Correctional Facility et al
as 3:2024cv00289
Plaintiff:
Kareem O Carter
Defendant:
Miami Correctional Facility, Morgan, English and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Wilburn v. Reagle et al
as 3:2024cv00296
Plaintiff:
Anthony Tyrell Wilburn and Anthony T Wilburn
Defendant:
Christina Reagle, Ron Neal, David Liebel and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Moorman v. Raglin et al
as 3:2024cv00284
Plaintiff:
Kir Moorman
Defendant:
Raglin, Killingsworth and Wayfield
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Sharp v. Gretchen et al
as 1:2024cv00139
Plaintiff:
Richard Sharp
Defendant:
Gretchen and Tasha
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
