US District Court for the Southern District of Indiana Other Statutes Cases

Antitrust Cases, Dockets and Filings
Cases filed
Cases 51 - 60 of 83
RSS Feed | View as table
IN RE ORTHOPAEDIC IMPLANT DEVICE ANTITRUST LITIGATION Featured Case
as 1:2007ml09831
Plaintiff: PAUL J. CHAIKEN, DDS, PAUL J. CHAIKEN, DDS, SOUTH CENTRAL SURGICAL CENTER, LLC and others
Defendant: BIOMET, INC, BIOMET, INC, BIOMET, INC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Anti-trust
AVIDAIR HELICOPTER SUPPLY, INC. v. ROLLS-ROYCE CORPORATION
as 1:2007cv00077
Plaintiff: AVIDAIR HELICOPTER SUPPLY, INC.
Defendant: ROLLS-ROYCE CORPORATION and ROLLS-ROYCE CORPORATION
Counter Claimant: ROLLS-ROYCE CORPORATION and ROLLS-ROYCE CORPORATION
Counter Defendant: AVIDAIR HELICOPTER SUPPLY, INC.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2 Antitrust Litigation
SHERIDAN et al v. MARATHON PETROLEUM COMPANY LLC et al
as 1:2006cv01233
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation
SOUTH CENTRAL SURGICAL CENTER, LLC v. ZIMMER HOLDINGS, INC. et al
as 1:2006cv01068
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Anti-trust
LEITNER v. CLEAR CHANNEL COMMUNICATIONS, INC. et al
as 1:2006cv00883
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2 Antitrust Litigation
T&R CONTRACTOR, INC. v. IRVING MATERIALS, INC. et al
as 1:2005cv01365
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation
WARDWELL BROTHERS, INC. v. BUILDER'S CONCRETE & SUPPLY CO., INC. et al
as 1:2005cv01296
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 15 Antitrust Litigation
MARMAX CONSTRUCTION, LLC et al v. IRVING MATERIALS, INC. et al
as 1:2005cv01280
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation
TIPPMANN CONSTRUCTION, INC. et al v. IRVING MATERIALS, INC.
as 1:2005cv01278
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation
WININGER/STOLBERG GROUP, INC. et al v. IRVING MATERIALS, INC. et al
as 1:2005cv01265
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?