US District Court for the Southern District of Indiana Civil Rights Cases

Cases filed
Cases 141 - 150 of 9,335
MULLINS v. MILLER et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2020cv02900
Defendant: STATE OF INDIANA, DEPT. OF WEIGHTS AND MEASURES, DAVID FLEISHHAKER and others
Plaintiff: DAVID M. MULLINS
Cause Of Action: Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
BROWN v. KROH
as 1:2020cv02928
Defendant: STANLEY KROH
Plaintiff: PETER BROWN
Cause Of Action: Prisoner Civil Rights
BRISCOE v. BARATZ et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2020cv02912
Defendant: LINDA BAILEY, ARNOLD P. BARATZ, CRAIG SOLOMAN and others
Plaintiff: THEODORE BRISCOE, JR.
Cause Of Action: Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2020cv02902
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
EDDELMAN v. MYERS et al
as 1:2020cv02925
Defendant: BARTHOLOMEW COUNTY SHERIFF'S DEPARTMENT, MATTHEW A. MYERS, GOVERNMENT OF BARTHOLOMEW COUNTY
Plaintiff: JUSTIN C. EDDELMAN
Cause Of Action: Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2020cv02907
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Job Discrimination (Employment)
MERCADO v. YOUNG et al
as 1:2020cv02887
Defendant: KYLE YOUNG, CITY OF COLUMBUS, MICHAEL RICHARDSON
Plaintiff: ANGELITO C MERCADO, ANGELITO C. MERCADO
Cause Of Action: Notice of Removal
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2020cv02864
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2020cv02861
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2020cv02847
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: The Americans with Disabilities Act

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?