Southern District of Prisoner Petitions Cases

Cases filed


Cases 1 - 10 of 9,821
ROBERSON v. SUPERINTENDENT
as 1:2017cv00509
Miscellaneou: PLAINFIELD CF (Court Use Only)
Petitioner: MIGUEL ROBERSON
Respondent: SUPERINTENDENT
Cause Of Action: Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
MACHADO-CANTILLO v. USA
as 4:2017cv00033
Petitioner: ORLIS MACHADO-CANTILLO
Respondent: USA
Cause Of Action: Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
ROBERSON v. SUPERINTENDENT
as 1:2017cv00508
Miscellaneou: PLAINFIELD CF (Court Use Only)
Petitioner: MIGUEL ROBERSON
Respondent: SUPERINTENDENT
Cause Of Action: Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
ROBERSON v. SUPERINTENDENT
as 1:2017cv00507
Miscellaneou: PLAINFIELD CF (Court Use Only)
Petitioner: MIGUEL ROBERSON
Respondent: SUPERINTENDENT
Cause Of Action: Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
PITCHFORD v. BUNCH et al
as 2:2017cv00087
Defendant: DEPUTY BERRY, CORPORAL BUCHANAN, OFFICER MARK BUNCH and others
Plaintiff: DEJON PITCHFORD
Miscellaneou: PUTNAMVILLE CF (Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: Prisoner Civil Rights
GAMBREL v. INDIANA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS et al
as 1:2017cv00503
Defendant: CORRECTIONAL OFFICER CROW, INDIANA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, CORRECTIONAL OFFICER JOHN DOE 1-10 and others
Plaintiff: NORMAN GAMBREL
Cause Of Action: Prisoner Civil Rights
BRISCOE v. KNIGHT
as 1:2017cv00495
Petitioner: JAMES D. BRISCOE
Respondent: STANLEY KNIGHT
Cause Of Action: Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
BOWLING v. JORDAN et al
as 1:2017cv00493
Plaintiff: STEVEN B. BOWLING
Defendant: CORIZON, JANE DOE #1, JOHN DOE #1 and others
Cause Of Action: Prisoner Civil Rights
BRISCOE v. KNIGHT
as 1:2017cv00496
Petitioner: JAMES D. BRISCOE
Respondent: STANLEY KNIGHT
Cause Of Action: Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
QUARLES v. KNIGHT
as 1:2017cv00470
Respondent: STANLEY KNIGHT
Petitioner: DAMON QUARLES
Cause Of Action: Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?