US District Court for the District of Massachusetts Torts - Injury Cases
Cases 41 - 50 of 14,870
Pollard v. Covidien LP et al
as 1:2024cv10962
Plaintiff:
Marsha Pollard
Defendant:
Covidien LP and Sofradim Production SAS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Daniels v. Covidien, LP et al
as 1:2024cv10964
Plaintiff:
Lawrence Daniels
Defendant:
Covidien, LP and Sofradim Production SAS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Egolkin v. Covidien LP et al
as 1:2024cv10969
Plaintiff:
Robert Michael Egolkin
Defendant:
Covidien LP and Sofradim Production SAS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Lilly v. Greylock McKinnon Associates, Inc.
as 1:2024cv10951
Plaintiff:
Richard Lilly
Defendant:
Greylock McKinnon Associates, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Felix v. Covidien LP et al
as 1:2024cv10956
Plaintiff:
Victor Felix
Defendant:
Covidien LP and Sofradim Production SAS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Harding v. Cooley
as 1:2024cv10936
Plaintiff:
Kevin Harding
Defendant:
Allison Cooley
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Huffman v. Covidien, LP et al
as 1:2024cv10941
Plaintiff:
John Huffman
Defendant:
Covidien, LP and Sofradim Production SAS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
McCarthy v. Covidien, Inc. et al
as 1:2024cv10942
Plaintiff:
Joseph McCarthy
Defendant:
Covidien, Inc. and Sofradim Production SAS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Skelton v. Covidien LP et al
as 1:2024cv10947
Plaintiff:
James Skelton
Defendant:
Covidien LP and Sofradim Production SAS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Harding v. Central Intelligence Agency
as 1:2024cv10939
Plaintiff:
Kevin Harding
Defendant:
Central Intelligence Agency
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
