District of Prisoner Petitions Cases

General Cases, Dockets and Filings

Cases filed


Cases 1 - 10 of 1,454
Evstegneev v. State of Maryland et al
as 1:2017cv01659
Petitioner: Vasiliy Evstegneev
Respondent: State of Maryland, The Attorney General of the State of Maryland
Cause Of Action: Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Brount v. Frosh
as 8:2017cv01465
Petitioner: Ronald Brount
Respondent: Brian E. Frosh
Cause Of Action: Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Mills v. Warden
as 1:2017cv01477
Petitioner: Anthony Jerome Mills
Respondent: Warden
Cause Of Action: Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Hayes v. Foxwell et al
as 1:2017cv01432
Petitioner: Shea Douglas Hayes
Respondent: Ricky Foxwell, The Attorney General of the State of Maryland
Cause Of Action: Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Spence v. Stouffer
as 8:2017cv01377
Petitioner: Dwayne Spence
Respondent: Warden Stouffer
Defendant: Douglas F. Gansler
Cause Of Action: Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Green v. State of Maryland
as 1:2017cv01338
Petitioner: Terry Green
Respondent: State of Maryland
Cause Of Action: Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Mosby v. Bishop et al
as 1:2017cv01290
Petitioner: Kevin Ramon Mosby
Respondent: Frank Bishop, Jr., John McCarthy, Attorney General of the State of Maryland
Cause Of Action: Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Nero v. Oddo et al
as 8:2017cv01263
Petitioner: James Nero
Respondent: L. J. Oddo, Allenwood United States Penitentiary
Cause Of Action: Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Ameyapoh v. Frosh
as 1:2017cv01257
Petitioner: Koffi Ameyapoh
Respondent: Brian Frosh
Cause Of Action: Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Keiser v. Foxwell et al.
as 1:2017cv01240
Petitioner: James Eugene Keiser
Defendant: Ricky Foxwell, Brian Frosh
Cause Of Action: Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?