US District Court for the District of Maryland Prisoner Petitions Cases
Cases 41 - 50 of 2,101
Gray v. State of Maryland
as 1:2023cv02779
Petitioner:
Davon D. Gray
Respondent:
State of Maryland
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Poole v. Darden
as 1:2023cv02770
Petitioner:
William Norris Poole, Jr.
Respondent:
Deborah Darden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Harris-El v. Baltimore City, MD
as 1:2023cv02755
Petitioner:
Keith Harris-El
Respondent:
Baltimore City, MD
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Vaughan v. USA
as 1:2023cv02479
Plaintiff:
Donald D. Vaughan
Defendant:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Moss v. State of Maryland
as 1:2023cv02642
Petitioner:
Michael Jerome Moss
Respondent:
State of Maryland
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Kirchner v. State of Maryland
as 1:2023cv02595
Petitioner:
Ronald Kirchner
Respondent:
State of Maryland
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Beard v. Bohrer et al
as 1:2023cv02574
Petitioner:
Wendell Beard
Respondent:
William S. Bohrer and Maryland Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Farmer v. Greene et al
as 1:2023cv02552
Petitioner:
Devonte Farmer
Respondent:
Warden Greene, FA Adise and Maryland Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Sydnor v. Weber
as 1:2023cv02521
Petitioner:
Davonne Sydnor
Respondent:
Ronald Shane Weber
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Rembold v. Bohrer et al
as 1:2023cv02348
Petitioner:
Donald G. Rembold
Respondent:
William S. Bohrer, Warden of MCTC and Maryland Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
