US District Court for the District of Maine Contract Cases
Cases 11 - 20 of 21
PORTLAND REGENCY INC et al v. RBS CITIZENS NA et al
as 2:2012cv00408
Plaintiff:
PORTLAND REGENCY INC and TOP OF EXCHANGE LLC
Defendant:
RBS CITIZENS NA and CITIZENS BANK NEW HAMPSHIRE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Notice of Removal
ALBISTON v. AVALENCE LLC
as 2:2012cv00239
Plaintiff:
BRUCE W ALBISTON
Defendant:
AVALENCE LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
CLOUGH v. PRESNALL et al
as 2:2012cv00054
Plaintiff:
JULIA CLOUGH
Defendant:
ED PRESNALL and PAWMARK LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
PNC BANK NATIONAL ASSOCIATION et al v. CRYSTAL TOUCH CAR WASH LLC et al
as 2:2009cv00292
Plaintiff:
PNC BANK NATIONAL ASSOCIATION
Defendant:
CARLY R SMITH
Cross_claimant:
CARLY R SMITH
Cross_defendant:
CRYSTAL TOUCH CAR WASH LLC and ERIK M SALMINEN
Counter_claimant:
CARLY R SMITH
Counter_defendant:
PNC BANK NATIONAL ASSOCIATION
Cause Of Action: Diversity
INEOS OLEFINS AND POLYMERS v. CORRECT BUILDING PRODUCTS LLC
as 2:2009cv00232
Plaintiff:
INEOS OLEFINS AND POLYMERS
Defendant:
CORRECT BUILDING PRODUCTS LLC
Cause Of Action: Diversity
DE GAETANO v. LAPINSKI et al
as 1:2008cv00294
Plaintiff:
RICHARD DE GAETANO
Defendant:
JOHN J LAPINSKI and LINDA S LAPINSKI
Trustee:
BANGOR SAVINGS BANK, MACHIAS SAVINGS BANK, CAMDEN NATIONAL BANK and others
Cause Of Action: Diversity
MONSEN v. US BANK NA et al
as 1:2008cv00051
Plaintiff:
ARTHUR M MONSEN, JR
Defendant:
US BANK NA and OCWEN LOAN SERVICING LLC
Counter_claimant:
US BANK NA and OCWEN LOAN SERVICING LLC
Counter_defendant:
ARTHUR M MONSEN, JR and MARIA N MONSEN
Cause Of Action: Diversity
PEARCE v. AMERIQUEST MORTGAGE COMPANY
as 2:2006cv00167
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Negotiable Instrumen
TD BANKNORTH NA v. KEY BANK NA
as 2:2005cv00180
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Negotiable Instrument
PERRY et al v. WOLAVER et al
as 2:2005cv00161
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
