US District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan Intellectual Property Cases
Cases 111 - 120 of 928
Stephens v. Phoenix Composite Solutions et al
as 1:2018cv12016
Plaintiff:
Carlis G Stephens
Defendant:
Phoenix Composite Solutions, Inc. and John Chagnon
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1126
Twin-Star International, Inc. v. Dimplex North America Limited
as 2:2018cv11842
Defendant:
Dimplex North America Limited
Plaintiff:
Twin-Star International, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
Shar Products Company v. Landmark Technology, LLC
as 2:2018cv11792
Plaintiff:
Shar Products Company
Defendant:
Landmark Technology, LLC
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
Progme Corporation v. Google LLC
as 2:2018cv11728
Defendant:
Google LLC
Plaintiff:
Progme Corporation
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1126
Hantz Software, LLC v. Sage Software, Inc.
as 2:2018cv11725
Plaintiff:
Hantz Software, LLC
Defendant:
Sage Software, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1338
Beverage Dispensing Solutions LLC v. De Jong Duke, LLC
as 5:2018cv11479
Plaintiff:
Beverage Dispensing Solutions LLC
Defendant:
De Jong Duke, LLC
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
Gorilla Power, LLC et al v. Fullerton Tool Company, Inc. et al
as 1:2018cv11293
Plaintiff:
Gorilla Power, LLC and Gorilla Tools, Inc.
Defendant:
Fullerton Tool Company, Inc. and JM Lawson Associates, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1338
Theisen Group LLC et al v. Inventive Consulting LLC et al
as 4:2018cv11198
Plaintiff:
Theisen Group LLC and T.J. Theisen
Defendant:
Inventive Consulting LLC , Mohamed Zeidan and Slobodan Pavlovic
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
v. Inventive Consulting LLC et al
as 2:2018cv11197
Defendant:
Inventive Consulting LLC, Mohamed Zeidan and Slobodan Pavlovic
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Handstands Promo, LLC v. Slip to Grip, LLC
as 5:2018cv11157
Plaintiff:
Handstands Promo, LLC
Defendant:
Slip to Grip, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1338
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
