US District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan Intellectual Property Cases
Cases 71 - 80 of 3,792
Strike 3 Holdings, LLC v. John Doe
as 2:2023cv13105
Plaintiff:
Strike 3 Holdings, LLC
Defendant:
John Doe
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101 Copyright Infringement
Strike 3 Holdings, LLC v. John Doe
as 4:2023cv13088
Plaintiff:
Strike 3 Holdings, LLC
Defendant:
John Doe
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101 Copyright Infringement
Strike 3 Holdings, LLC v. John Doe
as 2:2023cv13090
Plaintiff:
Strike 3 Holdings, LLC
Defendant:
John Doe
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101 Copyright Infringement
Strike 3 Holdings, LLC v. John Doe
as 2:2023cv13091
Plaintiff:
Strike 3 Holdings, LLC
Defendant:
John Doe
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101 Copyright Infringement
Strike 3 Holdings, LLC v. John Doe
as 2:2023cv13092
Plaintiff:
Strike 3 Holdings, LLC
Defendant:
John Doe
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101 Copyright Infringement
Strike 3 Holdings, LLC v. John Doe
as 2:2023cv13086
Plaintiff:
Strike 3 Holdings, LLC
Defendant:
John Doe
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101 Copyright Infringement
Strike 3 Holdings, LLC v. John Doe
as 2:2023cv13089
Plaintiff:
Strike 3 Holdings, LLC
Defendant:
John Doe
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101 Copyright Infringement
GM Global Technology Operations, LLC v. Quality Collision Parts, Inc.
as 2:2023cv13026
Plaintiff:
GM Global Technology Operations, LLC
Defendant:
Quality Collision Parts, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1338 Patent Infringement
Howarth v. Granite and Marble Design, LLC
as 2:2023cv13010
Plaintiff:
Morgan Howarth
Defendant:
Granite and Marble Design, LLC
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 501 Copyright Infringement
Yang v. Shenzhen Hongfangrui Technology Co., Ltd. et al
as 2:2023cv13001
Plaintiff:
Haowei Yang
Defendant:
Shenzhen Hongfangrui Technology Co., Ltd. and shenzhenshiheqilianshengjishuyouxiangongsi
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 501 Copyright Infringement
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
