US District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan Other Statutes Cases

Antitrust Cases, Dockets and Filings
Cases filed
Cases 91 - 100 of 700
Group 1 Automotive, Incorporated, as Assignee on Behalf of Group 1 Automotive Wholly-owned Subsidiary Dealerships et al v. Aisan Industry Company, Limited et al
as 2:2017cv12013
Plaintiff: Group 1 Automotive, Incorporated, as Assignee on Behalf of Group 1 Automotive Wholly-owned Subsidiary Dealerships , Asbury Automotive Group, Incorporated, as Assignee on Behalf of Asbury Automotive Wholly-owned Subsidiary Dealerships , Van Tuyl Group, LLC, as Assignee on Behalf of Assignor Dealerships and others
Defendant: Aisan Industry Company, Limited, Franklin Precision Industry, Incorporated, Aisan Corporation of America and others
Cause Of Action: Antitrust Litigation
Group 1 Automotive, Incorporated, as Assignee on Behalf of Group 1 Automotive Wholly-owned Subsidiary Dealerships et al v. Toyoda Gosei Company, Limited et al
as 2:2017cv12001
Plaintiff: Group 1 Automotive, Incorporated, as Assignee on Behalf of Group 1 Automotive Wholly-owned Subsidiary Dealerships , Asbury Automotive Group, Incorporated, as Assignee on Behalf of Asbury Automotive Wholly-owned Subsidiary Dealerships , Van Tuyl Group, LLC, as Assignee on Behalf of Assignor Dealerships and others
Defendant: Toyoda Gosei Company, Limited, Toyoda Gosei North America Corporation, TG Kentucky, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: Antitrust Litigation
Group 1 Automotive, Incorporated, as Assignee on Behalf of Group 1 Automotive Wholly-owned Subsidiary Dealerships et al v. Mitsuba Corporation et al
as 2:2017cv12012
Plaintiff: Group 1 Automotive, Incorporated, as Assignee on Behalf of Group 1 Automotive Wholly-owned Subsidiary Dealerships , Asbury Automotive Group, Incorporated, as Assignee on Behalf of Asbury Automotive Wholly-owned Subsidiary Dealerships , Van Tuyl Group, LLC, as Assignee on Behalf of Assignor Dealerships and others
Defendant: Mitsuba Corporation, American Mitsuba Corporation
Cause Of Action: Antitrust Litigation
Group 1 Automotive, Incorporated, et al v. Denso Corporation et al
as 2:2017cv12030
Plaintiff: Group 1 Automotive, Incorporated, as Assignee on Behalf of Group 1 Automotive Wholly-owned Subsidiary Dealerships , Asbury Automotive Group, Incorporated, as Assignee on Behalf of Asbury Automotive Wholly-owned Subsidiary Dealerships , Van Tuyl Group, LLC, as Assignee on Behalf of Assignor Dealerships and others
Defendant: Denso Corporation, Denso International America, Incorporated, Continental Automotive Electronics LLC and others
Cause Of Action: Antitrust Litigation
Group 1 Automotive, Incorporated, as Assignee on Behalf of Group 1 Automotive Wholly-owned Subsidiary Dealerships et al v. Denso Corporation et al
as 2:2017cv11995
Plaintiff: Group 1 Automotive, Incorporated, as Assignee on Behalf of Group 1 Automotive Wholly-owned Subsidiary Dealerships , Asbury Automotive Group, Incorporated, as Assignee on Behalf of Asbury Automotive Wholly-owned Subsidiary Dealerships , Van Tuyl Group, LLC, as Assignee on Behalf of Assignor Dealerships and others
Defendant: Denso Corporation, Denso International America, Incorporated, Mitsubishi Electric Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: Antitrust Litigation
Group 1 Automotive, Incorporated, as Assignee on Behalf of Group 1 Automotive Wholly-owned Subsidiary Dealerships et al v. Toyo Denso Company, Limited et al
as 4:2017cv11979
Plaintiff: Group 1 Automotive, Incorporated, as Assignee on Behalf of Group 1 Automotive Wholly-owned Subsidiary Dealerships , Asbury Automotive Group, Incorporated, as Assignee on Behalf of Asbury Automotive Wholly-owned Subsidiary Dealerships , Van Tuyl Group, LLC, as Assignee on Behalf of Assignor Dealerships
Defendant: Toyo Denso Company, Limited, Weastec, Incorporated, Omron Automotive Electronics Company, Limited
Cause Of Action: Antitrust Litigation
Group 1 Automotive, Incorporated, as Assignee on Behalf of Group 1 Automotive Wholly-owned Subsidiary Dealerships et al v. DENSO Corporation et al
as 2:2017cv11999
Plaintiff: Group 1 Automotive, Incorporated, as Assignee on Behalf of Group 1 Automotive Wholly-owned Subsidiary Dealerships , Asbury Automotive Group, Incorporated, as Assignee on Behalf of Asbury Automotive Wholly-owned Subsidiary Dealerships , Van Tuyl Group, LLC, as Assignee on Behalf of Assignor Dealerships and others
Defendant: DENSO Corporation, DENSO International America, Incorporated, T.RAD Company, Limited and others
Cause Of Action: Antitrust Litigation
Group 1 Automotive, Incorporated, as Assignee on Behalf of Group 1 Automotive Wholly-owned Subsidiary Dealerships et al v. Valeo Japan Company, Limited et al
as 2:2017cv11992
Plaintiff: Group 1 Automotive, Incorporated, as Assignee on Behalf of Group 1 Automotive Wholly-owned Subsidiary Dealerships , Asbury Automotive Group, Incorporated, as Assignee on Behalf of Asbury Automotive Wholly-owned Subsidiary Dealerships , Van Tuyl Group, LLC, as Assignee on Behalf of Assignor Dealerships and others
Defendant: Valeo Japan Company, Limited, Valeo Incorporated, Valeo Electrical Systems, Incorporated and others
Cause Of Action: Antitrust Litigation
Group 1 Automotive, Incorporated, as Assignee on Behalf of Group 1 Automotive Wholly-owned Subsidiary Dealerships et al v. Bridgestone Corporation et al
as 2:2017cv11997
Plaintiff: Group 1 Automotive, Incorporated, as Assignee on Behalf of Group 1 Automotive Wholly-owned Subsidiary Dealerships , Asbury Automotive Group, Incorporated, as Assignee on Behalf of Asbury Automotive Wholly-owned Subsidiary Dealerships , Van Tuyl Group, LLC, as Assignee on Behalf of Assignor Dealerships and others
Defendant: Bridgestone Corporation, Bridgestone APM Company, Toyo Tire & Rubber Company, Limited and others
Cause Of Action: Antitrust Litigation
Koleszar et al v. Dorman Products, Inc. We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 5:2017cv11523
Plaintiff: Jim Koleszar , Needa Parts Manufacturing, Inc.
Defendant: Dorman Products, Inc.

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?