US District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan Torts - Property Cases
Cases 31 - 40 of 1,520
Mitchell et al v. A&H Used Cars Inc.
as 5:2023cv12862
Plaintiff:
Hanee Mitchell and Alexis Coffey
Defendant:
A&H Used Cars Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1981 Fraud-Motor Vehicle (Odometer)
Nosike v. Delta Air Lines, Inc.
as 2:2023cv12785
Plaintiff:
Stephen E. Nosike
Defendant:
Delta Air Lines, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Title, Inc. v. U.S. Bancorp
as 4:2023cv12725
Defendant:
U.S. Bancorp and U.S. Bank, N.A.
Plaintiff:
Title, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud
Scott v. Flagstar Bank, N.A.
as 4:2023cv12726
Plaintiff:
Cynthia Scott
Defendant:
Flagstar Bank, N.A.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Westfield Insurance Company v. Ragland
as 2:2023cv12710
Plaintiff:
WESTFIELD INSURANCE COMPANY
Defendant:
Dorion Ragland
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Account Receivable
Amirul El v. Wayne, County of et al
as 2:2023cv12587
Plaintiff:
Mikhael Amirul El
Defendant:
Wayne, County of, Kinloch Jonathan, Timothy Kenny and others
Claimant:
Mikhael Amirul El Trust and Michael Anthony Bryant, TTEE
Virtual Integrated Analytics Solutions LLC v. Formicola
as 2:2023cv12515
Plaintiff:
Virtual Integrated Analytics Solutions LLC
Defendant:
Joe Formicola
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Desormeaux et al v. United States Postal Service et al
as 4:2023cv12480
Plaintiff:
Joseph Linnell Desormeaux, Jr. and Lisa Ann Desormeaux
Defendant:
United States Postal Service, John Doe and Keenan Heard
Transcend Company, Inc. v. Kessler
as 2:2023cv12383
Plaintiff:
Transcend Company, Inc.
Defendant:
Jesse Kessler
Rahimi v. Global Financial Motors LLC
as 2:2023cv12275
Plaintiff:
Ahmad Rahimi
Defendant:
Global Financial Motors LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2301 Magnuson-Moss Warranty Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
