District of Other Statutes Cases

Other Statutory Actions Cases, Dockets and Filings

Cases filed


Cases 1 - 10 of 495
Mille Lacs Band of Objibwe et al v. County of Mille Lacs, Minnesota et al
as 0:2017cv05155
Defendant: County of Mille Lacs, Minnesota, Joseph Walsh, Brent Lindgren
Plaintiff: Mille Lacs Band of Ojibwe , Sara Rice , Derrick Naumann
Cause Of Action: Indian Tribal Controversy
Powell v. Synchrony Bank, N.A.
as 0:2017cv05081
Plaintiff: Angela Powell
Defendant: Synchrony Bank, N.A.
Amdamaskal v. Amdamaskal
as 0:2017cv04961
Petitioner: Adis Marsha Amdamaskal
Respondent: Selamawit Marsha Amdamaskal
Counter_claimant: Selamawit Marsha Amdamaskal
Counter_defendant: Adis Marsha Amdamaskal
Cause Of Action: Return of Child/ Rights of Access to Child
v. Arbor Pharmaceuticals, LLC et al
as 0:2017cv04909
Defendant: Arbor Pharmaceuticals, LLC, ANI Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
Cause Of Action: Trademark Infringement (Lanham Act)
Epstein v. Capital One Bank (USA), N.A.
as 0:2017cv04658
Plaintiff: Julie Epstein
Defendant: Capital One Bank (USA), N.A.
Cause Of Action: (b)(3) Telephone Consumer Protection Act of 1991
Girdner v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.
as 0:2017cv04456
Plaintiff: Justin Girdner
Defendant: Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.
Cause Of Action: (b)(3) Telephone Consumer Protection Act of 1991
Fisherman v. Salazar
as 0:2017cv04348
Plaintiff: Corey Edward Fisherman
Defendant: Kenneth Lee Salazar
Cause Of Action: Fed. Question
Fischer v. Capital One Bank (USA), N.A.
as 0:2017cv04219
Plaintiff: Jason Fischer
Defendant: Capital One Bank (USA), N.A.
Cause Of Action: (b)(3) Telephone Consumer Protection Act of 1991
Irrgang v. Citibank, N.A.
as 0:2017cv04189
Plaintiff: Mary Jo Irrgang
Defendant: Citibank, N.A.
Cause Of Action: (b)(3) Telephone Consumer Protection Act of 1991
Glazewski v. Citibank, N.A.
as 0:2017cv04187
Plaintiff: Susan Glazewski
Defendant: Citibank, N.A.
Cause Of Action: (b)(3) Telephone Consumer Protection Act of 1991

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?