US District Court for the District of Minnesota Torts - Injury Cases
Cases 21 - 30 of 50
Smith-Bunge v. Wisconsin Central, Ltd., et al.
as 0:2015cv04383
Plaintiff:
Todd Smith-Bunge
Defendant:
Wisconsin Central, Ltd.
Cause Of Action: 49 U.S.C. § 20101
Johnston v. BNSF Railway Company
as 0:2015cv03685
Plaintiff:
Jason Johnston
Defendant:
BNSF Railway Company
Anderson v. Dakota, Minnesota & Eastern Railroad Corporation
as 0:2015cv02672
Plaintiff:
Daniel J. Anderson
Defendant:
Dakota, Minnesota & Eastern Railroad Corporation
Cause Of Action: 45 U.S.C. § 51
John D. Dardis et al v. Wisconsin Central Ltd. et al
as 0:2015cv00129
Defendant:
Wisconsin Central Ltd., Lakes Gas Co. and Canadian National Railway Company
Plaintiff:
John D. Dardis and Robyn Dardis
Cause Of Action: 45 U.S.C. § 51
Luft v. BNSF Railway Company
as 0:2015cv00006
Plaintiff:
Dennis Luft
Defendant:
BNSF Railway Company
Cause Of Action: 49 U.S.C. § 20101
Bjornson v. Soo Line Railroad Company, et al
as 0:2014cv04596
Plaintiff:
Lonnie Bjornson
Defendant:
Soo Line Railroad Company and Glenwood Hospitality, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 49 U.S.C. § 20101
Loos v. BNSF Railway Company
as 0:2013cv03373
Plaintiff:
Michael D. Loos
Defendant:
BNSF Railway Company
Cause Of Action: 45 U.S.C. § 51
Ahnberg v. BNSF Railway Company
as 0:2013cv02371
Plaintiff:
Michael L. Ahnberg
Defendant:
BNSF Railway Company
Cause Of Action: 45 U.S.C. § 51
Weaver v. Wisconsin Central Ltd. et al
as 0:2013cv02335
Plaintiff:
William Kevin Weaver
Defendant:
Wisconsin Central Ltd., Illinois Central Railroad Company, CN Transportation Limited and others
Cause Of Action: 45 U.S.C. § 51
Klungtvedt v. Duluth, Missabe and Iron Range Railway Company et al
as 0:2013cv00251
Plaintiff:
David Klungtvedt
Defendant:
Duluth, Missabe and Iron Range Railway Company and CUSA ES, LLC
Cross_claimant:
Duluth, Missabe and Iron Range Railway Company
Cross_defendant:
CUSA ES, LLC
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
