US District Court for the District of Minnesota Civil Rights Cases
Cases 21 - 30 of 6,922
Alexander v. Nelson
as 0:2024cv01229
Plaintiff:
Jomari E. Alexander, Sr.
Defendant:
Misty Joy Nelson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Coonradt v. Krichbaum
as 0:2024cv01233
Plaintiff:
Joshua Jordan Coonradt
Defendant:
Krichbaum
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2024cv01227
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2024cv01231
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans with Disabilities Act
Mather v. Minnesota Department of Health and Human Services et al
as 0:2024cv01171
Plaintiff:
Natalie A. Mather
Defendant:
Minnesota Department of Health and Human Services and Jodi Harpstead
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2024cv01175
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans with Disabilities Act
Schoeszler v. Nettell et al
as 0:2024cv01197
Plaintiff:
Rhonda Eunice Schoeszler
Defendant:
Officer Nettell and Andrew Draper
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2024cv01174
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Race)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2024cv01158
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans with Disabilities Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2024cv01163
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans with Disabilities Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
