US District Court for the District of Minnesota
Cases 131 - 140 of 84,105
North Metro Harness Initiative LLC v. Beattie et al
as 0:2024cv01369
Plaintiff:
North Metro Harness Initiative LLC doing business as Running Aces
Defendant:
Michael Beattie, Craig Beaulieu, Raymond Brenny and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1964 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Rodriguez v. Sherburne County Jail
as 0:2024cv01367
Plaintiff:
Mark Anthony Rodriguez
Defendant:
Sherburne County Jail
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2024cv01368
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petiti
Corbos Deli Southside, LLC et al v. United Sugar Producers & Refiners Cooperative et al
as 0:2024cv01370
Plaintiff:
Corbos Deli Southside, LLC and Corbo Corner Deli, West LLC
Defendant:
United Sugar Producers & Refiners Cooperative f/k/a United Sugars Corporation, American Sugar Refining, Inc., ASR Group International, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation
Ray-Taylor v. O'Malley
as 0:2024cv01371
Plaintiff:
Rose Ray-Taylor
Defendant:
Martin J. O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Springer et al v. Arizant Healthcare, Inc.
as 0:2024cv01365
Plaintiff:
Lisa Springer and 3M Company
Defendant:
Arizant Healthcare, Inc.
Snyder v. 3M Company et al
as 0:2024cv01363
Plaintiff:
Gregory Synder
Defendant:
3M Company and Arizant Healthcare, Inc.
Cantu v. 3M Company et al
as 0:2024cv01362
Plaintiff:
Richard Cantu
Defendant:
3M Company and Arizant Healthcare, Inc.
Tyson v. 3M Company et al
as 0:2024cv01364
Plaintiff:
Julia Tyson
Defendant:
3M Company and Arizant Healthcare, Inc.
Valker v. 3M Company et al
as 0:2024cv01343
Plaintiff:
Stephanie Valker
Defendant:
3M Company and Arizant Healthcare, Inc
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
