US District Court for the Western District of Missouri
Cases 1 - 10 of 44,134
Malcolm v. Wardrip et al
as 4:2024cv00189
Plaintiff:
Felicia Malcolm
Defendant:
Junior Wardrip and VRC Companies LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Cierpiot v. Westrock Services, LLC et al
as 4:2024cv00191
Plaintiff:
Lucas Cierpiot
Defendant:
Westrock Services, LLC, Jason Hook and Rex Nelson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Employment Discrimination
Johnson v. Reliance Standard Life Insurance Company
as 4:2024cv00188
Plaintiff:
Antonia Johnson
Defendant:
Reliance Standard Life Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
Winegarner v. O'Malley
as 4:2024cv00187
Plaintiff:
Melissa Jean Winegarner
Defendant:
Martin J. O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Ramirez v. Menard Inc.
as 2:2024cv04039
Plaintiff:
Angela Ramirez
Defendant:
Menard Inc. doing business as Menards
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Hercules Flores et al v. City of Independence, Missouri
as 4:2024cv00184
Plaintiff:
Elvia C Hercules Flores and Mauricio A. Guerra Guillen
Defendant:
City of Independence, Missouri
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Vishnani v. City of Independence, Missouri
as 4:2024cv00185
Plaintiff:
Shiraj Vishnani and Salima Vishani
Defendant:
City of Independence, Missouri
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv00186
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Dees v. Kijakazi
as 6:2024cv03075
Plaintiff:
Danny Joe Dees
Defendant:
Kilolo Kijakazi
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWW)
Peck v. O'Malley
as 6:2024cv03074
Plaintiff:
Louise Ann Peck
Defendant:
Martin O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.