US District Court for the District of Montana Torts - Injury Cases
Cases 21 - 30 of 31
Aarstad v. BNSF Railway Company et al
as 4:2017cv00072
Plaintiff:
Korey L. Aarstad
Defendant:
BNSF Railway Company , John Swing , Maryland Casualty Company and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Day v. BNSF Railway Company et al
as 4:2017cv00075
Plaintiff:
Hazel M. Day
Defendant:
BNSF Railway Company , John Swing , Maryland Casualty Company and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Tong v. BNSF Railway Company et al
as 4:2017cv00082
Plaintiff:
Shawn C. Tong
Defendant:
BNSF Railway Company , John Swing , Robinson Insulation Company and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Murphy-Fauth v. BNSF Railway Company et al
as 4:2017cv00079
Plaintiff:
Carrie Sue Murphy-Fauth
Defendant:
BNSF Railway Company , John Swing , Robinson Insulation Company and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
McDowell v. Burlington Northern Santa Fe Railway Company et al
as 4:2016cv00067
Plaintiff:
Timothy S. McDowell
Defendant:
Burlington Northern Santa Fe Railway Company , Burlington Northern Railroad Company , Great Northern Railway Company and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Stacy et al v. BNSF Railway Company
as 9:2013cv00087
Plaintiff:
Dean Stacy, Norma Stacy, Donald Stacy and others
Defendant:
BNSF Railway Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
Hurlburt et al v. Bondex et al
as 4:2007cv00016
Plaintiff:
J. Murray Hurlburt, Renee Ratliff and Ardelle Hurlburt
Defendant:
Bondex, Durabond Products, Georgia Pacific and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
Clampitt v. Armstrong Cork Co., et al
as 4:2004cv00120
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
Ecklund v. Lincoln Electric, et al
as 4:2004cv00038
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Airline Crash
Hume, et al v. Burlington Northern, et al
as 4:2004cv00034
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
