Eastern District of Prisoner Petitions Cases

General Cases, Dockets and Filings

Cases filed


Cases 1 - 10 of 2,952
Jilani v. Harrison
as 5:2017hc02187
Petitioner: Mohammed N. Jilani
Respondent: Donnie Harrison
Cause Of Action: Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Alexander v. U.S. Parole Commission
as 5:2017hc02189
Petitioner: Kendell Alexander
Respondent: U.S. Parole Commission
Cause Of Action: Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Hernandez v. Clay
as 5:2017hc02188
Petitioner: Isidro Garcia Hernandez
Respondent: Harvey Clay
Cause Of Action: Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Shaw v. Unnamed Respondent
as 5:2017hc02185
Petitioner: Eric L. Shaw
Respondent: Unnamed Respondent
Cause Of Action: Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Torrez v. North Carolina Department of Public of Public Safety, Division of Prisons
as 5:2017hc02184
Petitioner: Juan Manuel Torrez
Respondent: North Carolina Department of Public Safety, Division of Prisons
Cause Of Action: Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Cromartie v. Unknown Respondent
as 5:2017hc02183
Petitioner: Christopher D. Cromartie, Jr.
Respondent: Unknown Respondent
Cause Of Action: Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
King v. Andrews
as 5:2017hc02181
Petitioner: Charles Jermaine King
Respondent: Justin Andrews
Cause Of Action: Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Garner v. State of North Carolina
as 5:2017hc02180
Petitioner: Brenda Williams Garner
Respondent: State of North Carolina
Cause Of Action: Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Garner v. Andrews
as 5:2017hc02178
Petitioner: James Antonio Garner
Respondent: Justin Andrews
Cause Of Action: Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Bynes v. State of North Carolina
as 5:2017hc02179
Petitioner: Jamar Vonzell Bynes
Respondent: State of North Carolina
Cause Of Action: Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?