US District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina Prisoner Petitions Cases
Cases 31 - 40 of 14,365
Capps v. Hunter et al
as 5:2024ct03079
Plaintiff:
Edward Rummus Capps, III
Defendant:
Sargent T. Hunter, Sargent Farrow and Warden Steven Wadell
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Guin v. North Carolina Adult Corrections
as 5:2024hc02076
Petitioner:
Charles Robert Guin, Jr.
Respondent:
North Carolina Adult Corrections
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Spates v. Cooper
as 5:2024ct03077
Plaintiff:
Andre Michael Spates and Andre M. Spates El
Defendant:
Governor Roy Cooper
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Thompson v. USA
as 5:2024cv00199
Petitioner:
Lycurtis Thompson
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
Snead v. USA
as 7:2024cv00328
Petitioner:
Marvarlus Cortel Snead
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
Cooper v. State
as 5:2024hc02074
Petitioner:
Kenneth Earl Cooper
Respondent:
State
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Hodge v. State of North Carolina
as 5:2024hc02075
Petitioner:
Robert L. Hodge
Respondent:
State of North Carolina
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2024hc02073
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 4241 Motion to Determine Mental Competency/Other Dist.
Hawkins v. Fountain et al
as 5:2024ct03076
Plaintiff:
Justin Hawkins and Justin Antonio Hawkins
Defendant:
Sheriff Robert Fountain, Chief Fred Robertson, Woodrow David Yancey and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Humphrey v. Sarratt
as 5:2024ct03075
Plaintiff:
Trinel Lamont Humphrey
Defendant:
Officer R.A. Sarratt
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
