US District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina Contract Cases

Negotiable Instrument Cases, Dockets and Filings

Cases filed


Cases 31 - 40 of 50
PEGGS v. INGLE et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2009cv00327
Plaintiff: JAMES PEGGS, SR.
Defendant: GRADY I INGLE, SHAPIRO & INGLE, GMAC MORTGAGE LLC and others
Cause Of Action: Truth in Lending
Type: Contract Plaintiff
CHEVRON U.S.A. INC. v. LAETTNER, et al Featured Case We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2009cv00232
Defendant: CHRISTIAN LAETTNER, THOMAS NIEMANN, BRIAN K. DAVIS
Plaintiff: CHEVRON U.S.A. INC.
Cause Of Action: Diversity-Contract Default
Case name Not on File
as 1:2009cv00212
Cause Of Action: Securities Exchange Act
Type: Contract None
PEGGS v. GMAC MORTGAGE, LLC
as 1:2009cv00173
Defendant: GMAC MORTGAGE, LLC
Plaintiff: JAMES PEGGS, SR.
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Type: Contract None
BRUMBY v. DEUTSCHE BANK NATIONAL TRUST COMPANY We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2009cv00144
Plaintiff: JOSEPH BRUMBY, JR.
Defendant: DEUTSCHE BANK NATIONAL TRUST COMPANY
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Type: Contract None
HALL et al v. U.S. BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION et al
as 1:2008cv00294
Plaintiff: CLAUDE HALL, ROBERT JOLLY
Defendant: U.S. BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, OPTION ONE, HUTCHENS, SENTER & BRITTON, PA
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Type: Contract Plaintiff
BELL v. BLUE DEVIL VENTURES, LLC et al Featured Case
as 1:2007cv00858
Defendant: BLUE DEVIL VENTURES, LLC, THOMAS M. NIEMANN, BRIAN K. DAVIS and others
Plaintiff: RHAHIME A. BELL
Cause Of Action: Diversity-Negotiable Instrument
GERNGROSS, et al v. CLARK
as 1:2007cv00211
Plaintiff: THOMAS GERNGROSS, JULIE GERNGROSS BAKER
Defendant: NATALIE GERNGROSS CLARK
Cause Of Action: Default of Promissory Note
ADAMS v. BANK OF AMERICA, N.A. et al
as 1:2006cv00228

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?