US District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina Social Security Cases
Cases 21 - 30 of 816
PAYLOR v. KIJAKAZI
as 1:2023cv00599
Plaintiff:
SYLVIA PAYLOR
Defendant:
KILOLO KIJAKAZI
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 416 Denial of Social Security Benefits
BAILEY v. KIJAKAZI
as 1:2023cv00553
Plaintiff:
JEANIE DIANE BAILEY
Defendant:
KILOLO KIJAKAZI
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
BAILEY v. SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION
as 1:2023cv00548
Plaintiff:
Jeanie Diane Bailey
Defendant:
SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
SANDOVAL v. KIJAKAZI
as 1:2023cv00485
Plaintiff:
Faustina Sandoval
Defendant:
KILOLO KIJAKAZI
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 416 Denial of Social Security Benefits
QUICK v. KIJAKAZI
as 1:2023cv00441
Plaintiff:
Crystal Quick
Defendant:
KILOLO KIJAKAZI
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 416 Denial of Social Security Benefits
PEGUESE v. KIJAKAZI
as 1:2023cv00403
Plaintiff:
REGINALD JEROME PEGUESE
Defendant:
KILOLO KIJAKAZI
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
WYATT v. KIJAKAZI
as 1:2023cv00406
Plaintiff:
CYNTHIA ANNE WYATT
Defendant:
KILOLO KIJAKAZI
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
SHELTON v. KIJAKAZI
as 1:2023cv00341
Plaintiff:
CHRISTOPHER S. SHELTON
Defendant:
KILOLO KIJAKAZI
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
KING v KIJAKAZI
as 1:2023cv00324
Plaintiff:
RONNIE KING
Defendant:
KILOLO KIJAKAZI
Interested Party:
SSAOGCOMMS and US ATTORNEY'S OFFICE - SOCIAL SECURITY NOTICING
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
SMITH v. COMMISSIONER OF THE SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION
as 1:2023cv00204
Plaintiff:
CASEY SMITH
Defendant:
COMMISSIONER OF THE SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION
Interested Party:
SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION and US ATTORNEY'S OFFICE - SOCIAL SECURITY NOTICING
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 416 Denial of Social Security Benefits
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
