US District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina Labor Cases
Cases 11 - 20 of 206
WILLIAMS v. KOURY CORPORATION
as 1:2023cv00425
Plaintiff:
ALEXANDRIA WILLIAMS
Defendant:
KOURY CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
BEERS v. JOHNSON
as 1:2023cv00367
Plaintiff:
Mr. ANDREW BEERS and ANDREW S. BEERS
Defendant:
TERRY S. JOHNSON
HAQ v. ADORA MANUFACTURING INC.
as 1:2023cv00316
Plaintiff:
EHSAN HAQ
Defendant:
ADORA MANUFACTURING INC.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
SWACKER v. OS RESTAURANT SERVICES, LLC
as 1:2023cv00076
Plaintiff:
JEANETTE SWACKER
Defendant:
OUTBACK STEAKHOUSE OF FLORIDA, LLC and OS RESTAURANT SERVICES, LLC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
THOMPSON v. DURHAM FOODS, INC.
as 1:2022cv01087
Plaintiff:
JERAMIE THOMPSON
Defendant:
DURHAM FOODS, INC. doing business as ZAXBYS RESTAURANTS
WILLIAMS v. TWOROG HOLDING, LLC
as 1:2022cv00965
Plaintiff:
CRYSTAL WILLIAMS
Defendant:
TWOROG HOLDING, LLC doing business as AARONS
BURLESON v. PELHAM TRANSPORTATION CORPORATION et al
as 1:2022cv00816
Plaintiff:
Christopher Burleson
Defendant:
PELHAM TRANSPORTATION CORPORATION and THEODORE J. DEJOURNETTE, JR
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Fair Labor Standards
TALLENT v. MEDICAL STAFFING OF AMERICA, LLC
as 1:2022cv00760
Plaintiff:
HEATHER TALLENT
Defendant:
MEDICAL STAFFING OF AMERICA, LLC doing business as STEADFAST MEDICAL STAFFING
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Denial of Overtime Compensation
LESTER v. TRIAD PIZZA LLC et al
as 1:2022cv00616
Plaintiff:
Scott Lester and SCOTT LESTER, JR.
Defendant:
Bradley Davis, Triad Pizza LLC, BD Pizza Co. LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
DERYAS v. BISCUITVILLE, INC. et al
as 1:2022cv00600
Plaintiff:
IHAB DERYAS
Defendant:
BISCUITVILLE, INC., BV FUND I, LLC, BV FUND II, LLC and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
