US District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina Labor Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 40
CONNOR v. UNC HEALTH CARE SYSTEM
as 1:2023cv01044
Plaintiff:
YAMICIA CONNOR
Defendant:
UNC HEALTH CARE SYSTEM
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
CORNISH v. CENTENE CORPORATION et al.
as 1:2022cv00794
Plaintiff:
KATHERINE CORNISH
Defendant:
CENTENE CORPORATION, COMPREHENSIVE HEALTH MANAGEMENT, INC. and WELLCARE OF NORTH CAROLINA, INC.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601 Family & Medical Leave Act
MORGAN v. CENTER FOR CREATIVE LEADERSHIP
as 1:2021cv00733
Plaintiff:
JESSICA GLAZER MORGAN
Defendant:
CENTER FOR CREATIVE LEADERSHIP
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601
CABANILLA v. ADUSA DISTRIBUTION, LLC
as 1:2021cv00668
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL CABANILLA
Defendant:
ADUSA DISTRIBUTION, LLC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601
VUNCANNON v. UWHARRIE GREEN SCHOOL, INC. et al
as 1:2021cv00246
Defendant:
DAVID MCRAE, CASEY HARRIS, UWHARRIE GREEN SCHOOL, INC. doing business as UWHARRIE CHARTER ACADEMY and others
Plaintiff:
HEATHER VUNCANNON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
DAVIS v. WIELAND COPPER PRODUCTS, LLC
as 1:2021cv00237
Plaintiff:
Roman Davis
Defendant:
WIELAND COPPER PRODUCTS, LLC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601
BRYANT v. MOTORSPORTS OF DURHAM, LLC
as 1:2020cv01101
Plaintiff:
SHANELL I. BRYANT
Defendant:
MOTORSPORTS OF DURHAM, LLC doing business as RAGINGBULL HARLEY DAVIDSON
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601
KEY v. MOBLE LINK (N.C.), LLC
as 1:2020cv01051
Defendant:
MOBLE LINK (N.C.), LLC and MOBILELINK NORTH CAROLINA LLC
Plaintiff:
MELANIE A. KEY
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601
STANLEY v. ENDURA PRODUCTS, LLC
as 1:2020cv00945
Plaintiff:
JAMES STANLEY
Defendant:
ENDURA PRODUCTS, LLC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601
HAYNES v. PITTSBURGH GLASS WORKS, LLC
as 1:2020cv00826
Defendant:
PITTSBURGH GLASS WORKS, LLC
Plaintiff:
ADAM W. HAYNES
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
