District of Cases

Cases filed


Cases 1 - 10 of 96,231
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2017cv00298
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Petition for Naturalization Hearing
v. BRISTOL-MYERS SQUIB COMPANY et al
as 3:2017cv00294
Defendant: BRISTOL-MYERS SQUIB COMPANY, SANOFI AVENTIS US, SANOFI U.S. SERVICES, INC. and others
Plaintiff: GINGER A PRICE OBO MARY ARLEDGE
Cause Of Action: Fed. Question: Personal Injury
JOHN
as 2:2017cv00297
Plaintiff: EPHRAIM JOHN
Defendant: Elie Tahari Ltd., John Does 1-5 and 6-10
Cause Of Action: Family Medical Leave Act
COX v. DAIICHI SANKYO, INC. et al
as 1:2017cv00296
Plaintiff: JEFFERY COX
Defendant: DAIICHI SANKYO, INC., DAIICHI SANKYO U.S. HOLDINGS, INC., DAIICHI SANKYO CO., LTD and others
Cause Of Action: Diversity-Product Liability
LANDRY et al v. THE ROSDEV GROUP et al
as 3:2017cv00292
Plaintiff: ELIDA LANDRY , TAYLOR LANDRY
Defendant: THE ROSDEV GROUP, ROSDEV MANAGEMENT, INC., ROSDEV HOSPITALITY, SEACAUCUS, LP and others
Cause Of Action: Diversity-Tort/Non-Motor Vehicle
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2017cv00293
Petitioner: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
v. JANCI et al
as 3:2017cv00295
Defendant: JAMES JANCI, HUNTERDON COUNTY PROSECUTOR, JOHN DOE # 1-10 and others
Plaintiff: RAYMOND HOF
Cause Of Action: Civil Rights Act
ROMANOWSKI v. COLVIN
as 2:2017cv00291
Plaintiff: JAMES ROMANOWSKI
Defendant: CAROLYN W. COLVIN
Cause Of Action: Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
CARNEYS POINT TOWNSHIP v. E. I. DU PONT DE NEMOURS AND COMPANY et al
as 1:2017cv00264
Defendant: E. I. DU PONT DE NEMOURS AND COMPANY , SHERYL A. TELFORD
Plaintiff: CARNEYS POINT TOWNSHIP
Cause Of Action: Diversity-Injunctive & Declaratory Relief
LEVY v. JP MORGAN CHASE & CO.
as 3:2017cv00253
Plaintiff: YAAKOV LEVY
Defendant: JP MORGAN CHASE & COMPANY
Cause Of Action: (b)(3) Telephone Consumer Protection Act of 1991

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?