US District Court for the Southern District of New York Forfeiture / Penalty Cases

Cases filed
Cases 1 - 10 of 576
United States of America v. $12,860.00 in United States Currency We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2020cv05189
Defendant: $12,860.00 in United States Currency
Plaintiff: United States of America
Cause Of Action: Civil Forfeiture
United States of America v. $485,821.65 in United States currency formerly on deposit in JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A., Account 209715972, held in the name of "RFTR Corporation," and all funds traceable thereto, et al
as 1:2020cv05179
Plaintiff: United States of America
Defendant: $434,122.61 in United States currency formerly on deposit in JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A., Account 519888635, held in the name of "Mooshad Consulting NYC, Inc.," and all funds traceable th, $485,821.65 in United States currency formerly on deposit in JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A., Account 209715972, held in the name of "RFTR Corporation," and all funds traceable thereto,
Cause Of Action: Civil Forfeiture
United States of America v. $189,019.92 in United States Currency formerly on deposit at Chemical Bank in Account Number 172-062-82-00065, held in the name of SAB MEDICAL EQUIPMENT SALES CORP. et al
as 1:2020cv05101
Defendant: $48,783.40 in United States Currency, formerly on deposit at Chemical Bank in Account Number 172-063-3648-65, held in the name of LECHIUM MEDICAL SUPPLY CORP, $189,019.92 in United States Currency formerly on deposit at Chemical Bank in Account Number 172-062-4282-65, held in the name of SAB MEDICAL EQUIPMENT SALES CORP., $53,072.52 in United States Currency, formerly on deposit at Smith Barney in Account Number 101-30465-19 held in the name of STEVEN A. BONANNO, Account for Nicole Bonanno and others
Plaintiff: United States of America
Alternative Dispute Resolution (Adr) Provider: $729.79 in United States Currency, formerly on deposit at Chemical Bank in Account Number 294-061-8024-65, held in the name of JOANNE DELPONTE BONANNO
Cause Of Action: Civil Forfeiture
United States of America v. $160,325,378 in United States Currency
as 1:2020cv03919
Defendant: $160,325,378 IN UNITED STATES CURRENCY
Plaintiff: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: Civil Forfeiture
United States of America v. Glaister
as 7:2020cv03583
Defendant: John K. Glaister
Plaintiff: United States of America
Cause Of Action: Penalty; Reports of Currency and Foreign Transaction
United States of America v. Glaister We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 7:2020cv03581
Defendant: Sarah E. Glaister
Plaintiff: United States of America
Consolidated Defendant: John K. Glaister
Cause Of Action: Penalty; Reports of Currency and Foreign Transaction
United States of America v. $4,730 Formerly on Deposit in Bank of America Account Ending in -6851, Held in the Name of Fardad Izadkhast et al
as 1:2020cv03262
Defendant: $84,650 Formerly Held in Capital One Account Ending in -6115, Held in the Name of Fatemeh Azmandian, $17,000 Formerly on Deposit in Citibank Account Ending in -0108, Held in the Name of Maryam Azmandian, $570 Formerly on Deposit in Bank of America Account Ending in -5282, Held in the Name of Mehdi Kalai and others
Plaintiff: United States of America
Cause Of Action: Civil Forfeiture
United States of America v. $51,000,000 in United States Currency We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2020cv03123
Defendant: $51,000,000 in United States Currency
Plaintiff: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: Civil Forfeiture
United States of America v. $141,680.00 in United States Currency
as 1:2020cv02915
Defendant: $141,680.00 in United States Currency
Plaintiff: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: Forfeiture Property-Drugs
United States of America v. Schik
as 1:2020cv02211
Defendant: Walter Schik
Plaintiff: United States of America
Cause Of Action: Penalty; Reports of Currency and Foreign Transaction

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?