US District Court for the Northern District of Ohio Prisoner Petitions Cases
Cases 51 - 60 of 10,402
Jones v. USA
as 3:2024cv00411
Petitioner:
Robert Jones, Jr.
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Lumpkin Jr. v. Core Civic Northeast Ohio Correctional Center
as 4:2024cv00406
Plaintiff:
David Thomas Lumpkin Jr.
Defendant:
Core Civic Northeast Ohio Correctional Center
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Arnoff v. Ferguson
as 5:2024cv00401
Plaintiff:
Bruce Arnoff
Defendant:
Denise Ferguson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
King v. Watson
as 3:2024cv00387
Petitioner:
Richard N. King
Respondent:
Warden Tom Watson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Jacobs v. Warden, Marion Correctional Institution
as 4:2024cv00367
Petitioner:
Phillip Douglas Jacobs
Respondent:
Warden Warden, Marion Correctional Institution
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Bugno v. Hunsinger
as 4:2024cv00348
Petitioner:
Alex Bugno
Respondent:
Warden Angela Hunsinger-Stuff
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
White v. USA
as 1:2024cv00340
Petitioner:
DeShawn A. White
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Harris v. USA
as 4:2024cv00343
Petitioner:
Bryan Harris
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00326
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Burns v. USA
as 4:2024cv00333
Petitioner:
Michael W. Burns
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
