US District Court for the Southern District of Ohio Torts - Injury Cases
Cases 41 - 50 of 17,380
Eiermann v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv01820
Plaintiff:
Byron John Eiermann
Defendant:
C.R. Bard, Inc. and Davol, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Crenshaw v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv01825
Plaintiff:
Gwendolyn Crenshaw
Defendant:
C.R. Bard, Inc. and Davol, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Crahen v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv01813
Plaintiff:
Brian T Crahen
Defendant:
C.R. Bard, Inc. and Davol, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Mills v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv01830
Plaintiff:
Clarence H Mills
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Bess v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv01829
Plaintiff:
Tina Bess
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Wellborn v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv01827
Plaintiff:
Michael Wellborn
Defendant:
C.R. Bard, Inc. and Bard Davol, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Henderson v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv01832
Plaintiff:
Robert Henderson
Defendant:
C.R. Bard, Inc. and Bard Davol, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Thomas v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv01834
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey Thomas
Defendant:
C.R. Bard, Inc. and Davol, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Kennerly v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv01837
Plaintiff:
Douglas Kennerly
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Horak et al v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv01810
Plaintiff:
Norma Horak and Joseph Horak
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
