US District Court for the Southern District of Ohio Torts - Injury Cases
Cases 71 - 80 of 30,665
Lipscomb v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv01900
Plaintiff:
William Lipscomb
Defendant:
C.R. Bard, Inc. and Bard Davol, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Green et al v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv01901
Plaintiff:
Lillian Green and Aree Green
Defendant:
C.R. Bard, Inc. and Bard Davol, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Drew v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv01904
Plaintiff:
Tracy Drew
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Villarreal v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv01849
Plaintiff:
Katherine Villarreal
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Sederburg v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv01857
Plaintiff:
Mary Sederburg
Defendant:
C.R. Bard, Inc. and Davol, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Marshall v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv01873
Plaintiff:
Tammy Marshall
Defendant:
C.R. Bard, Inc. and Davol, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Giddings v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv01880
Plaintiff:
Donald Giddings
Defendant:
C.R. Bard, Inc. and Davol, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Wurts v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv01854
Plaintiff:
Stephen G. Wurts
Defendant:
C.R. Bard, Inc. and Davol, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Barragan v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv01855
Plaintiff:
Joseph Barragan
Defendant:
C.R. Bard, Inc. and Davol, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Nava v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv01868
Plaintiff:
Jose Nava
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
