US District Court for the Northern District of Oklahoma Labor Cases
Cases 21 - 30 of 159
Anderson-Posey v. UNUM Life Insurance Company of America et al
as 4:2016cv00086
Plaintiff:
Traselynn Anderson-Posey
Defendant:
UNUM Life Insurance Company of America and CVS Pharmacy, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1001
Verges v. Leucadia National Corporation
as 4:2015cv00116
Plaintiff:
Martha de Verges
Defendant:
Leucadia National Corporation
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 206
Couch v. Sheet Metal Workers International Association et al
as 4:2014cv00601
Plaintiff:
Michael Couch
Defendant:
Sheet Metal Workers International Association , Sheet Metal Workers Local 270 and David Johnson
Counter_claimant:
Sheet Metal Workers Local 270
Counter_defendant:
Michael Couch
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 185
Grubb v. City of Oilton
as 4:2014cv00598
Plaintiff:
Larry D Grubb
Defendant:
City of Oilton
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 621
Bever v. Nowata County Election Board et al
as 4:2014cv00592
Plaintiff:
Tommy S Bever
Defendant:
Nowata County Election Board and Christina L Freeman
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343
Love v. Cox Retirement Properties, Inc.
as 4:2014cv00597
Plaintiff:
Ecle Love
Defendant:
Cox Retirement Properties, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2617
Williams v. Healthcare Services Group, Inc.
as 4:2014cv00482
Plaintiff:
Karmeisha Williams
Defendant:
Healthcare Services Group, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2617
Adair v. Conhold of Bartlesville, LLC
as 4:2014cv00469
Plaintiff:
Thomasina Adair
Defendant:
Conhold of Bartlesville, LLC
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Lee v. Aramark Correctional Services, L.L.C.
as 4:2014cv00460
Plaintiff:
Hattye Lee
Defendant:
Aramark Correctional Services, L.L.C.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Davis v. Baptist Village Retirement Communities of Oklahoma, Inc. et al
as 4:2014cv00459
Plaintiff:
Marcal Davis
Defendant:
Baptist Village Retirement Communities of Oklahoma, Inc. and Baptist Villages, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
