US District Court for the Western District of Oklahoma Other Statutes Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 69
Caloto v. Paycom Software, Inc. et al
as 5:2024cv00019
Plaintiff:
Chris H. Caloto
Defendant:
Paycom Software Inc, Chad Richison and Craig E. Boelte
Petitioner:
Calvin E Mein
Schoenrock v. Paycom Software Inc et al
as 5:2024cv00012
Plaintiff:
Corey Schoenrock
Defendant:
Paycom Software Inc, Chad Richison and Craig Boelte
Petitioner:
Calvin E Mein
Securities and Exchange Commission v. GreneCo LLC et al
as 5:2022cv00673
Plaintiff:
Securities and Exchange Commission
Defendant:
GreneCo LLC, Gene D Larson, Gregory K Womack and others
Matlock v. Redbird Business Group LLC et al
as 5:2022cv00498
Plaintiff:
Perry Matlock
Defendant:
Redbird Business Group LLC and Redbird Ventures LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 Fed. Question
Reinart v. Medicus Auri LLC et al
as 5:2020cv00437
Defendant:
Shawn Gillispie, Rusty Cagle, Medicus Auri LLC and others
Plaintiff:
Jason Todd Reinart
Securities and Exchange Commission v. Davidson
as 5:2019cv01153
Defendant:
John Kenneth Davidson
Plaintiff:
Securities and Exchange Commission
Securities and Exchange v. Special et al
as 5:2019cv01152
Plaintiff:
Securities and Exchange
Defendant:
Michael Murphy and John Special
City of Sarasota General Employees Defined Benefit Pension Plan v. Mammoth Energy Services Inc et al
as 5:2019cv00720
Defendant:
Arty Straehla, Mark Layton and Mammoth Energy Services Inc
Plaintiff:
City of Sarasota General Employees Defined Benefit Pension Plan
Normantas v. Mammoth Energy Services Inc et al
as 5:2019cv00560
Plaintiff:
Justas Normantas
Defendant:
Mark Layton, Arty Straehla, Mammoth Energy Services Inc and others
Scuderi v. Mammoth Energy Services Inc et al
as 5:2019cv00522
Defendant:
Arty Straehla, Mark Layton, Mammoth Energy Services Inc and others
Plaintiff:
Thomas Scuderi, Vincent Furia, Stephen Terry and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
