US District Court for the District of Oregon Prisoner Petitions Cases
Cases 91 - 100 of 10,107
Harper v. Roberts et al
as 2:2024cv00303
Plaintiff:
Daniel Zachary Harper
Defendant:
Dr. Warren Roberts, N.P.M. Davies, Joe Bugher and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
HICKS v. State of Oregon Department of Corrections
as 2:2024cv00297
Plaintiff:
MALCOLM HICKS
Defendant:
State of Oregon Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Stamper v. Hunter et al
as 2:2024cv00290
Plaintiff:
Robert James Stamper
Defendant:
Dusti Hunter and Lt. Wiggins
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hudson v. Blanton et al
as 3:2024cv00289
Plaintiff:
Carlos Hudson
Defendant:
Officer Blanton, Officer Huerta and SHU Lt. Roughton
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Green v. Miller
as 2:2024cv00287
Petitioner:
Michael Green
Respondent:
Jamie Miller
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Farris v. Reyes
as 2:2024cv00280
Petitioner:
Robin J. Farris
Respondent:
Erin Reyes
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Taylor v. Washington County Oregon et al
as 3:2024cv00288
Plaintiff:
Jermel Arcilicia Taylor
Defendant:
Washington County Oregon, Sheriff Lopez, Allison Brown and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
DelaRosa v. United States
as 2:2024cv00278
Plaintiff:
Anthony Michael DelaRosa
Defendant:
United States
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Wyatt v. Jacquez
as 3:2024cv00269
Petitioner:
Mikael Wyatt
Respondent:
Israel Jacquez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Cox v. Jacquez
as 3:2024cv00268
Petitioner:
Tyler Cox
Respondent:
Israel Jacquez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
