US District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania Social Security Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 5,516
SARANCHAK v. OMALLEY
as 2:2024cv01728
Plaintiff:
ASHLEY SARANCHAK
Defendant:
MARTIN J. OMALLEY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
BOYD v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
as 5:2024cv01684
Plaintiff:
TRAYVONE TYRELL BOYD
Defendant:
COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
MORAGNE v. OMALLEY
as 2:2024cv01688
Plaintiff:
LAWRENCE MORAGNE
Defendant:
MARTIN J. O'MALLEY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
TRICE v. OMALLEY
as 5:2024cv01661
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL SHAWN TRICE
Defendant:
MARTIN OMALLEY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
JOHNSON v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
as 2:2024cv01649
Plaintiff:
ANTHONY MITCHELL JOHNSON
Defendant:
COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
STELLATO v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
as 2:2024cv01604
Plaintiff:
MARIA STELLATO
Defendant:
COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Bailey v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
as 5:2024cv01562
Plaintiff:
Ms. Susan Bailey
Defendant:
COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Heck v. O'MALLEY
as 5:2024cv01565
Plaintiff:
Ms. Melanie Heck
Defendant:
COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Bailey v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
as 5:2024cv01568
Plaintiff:
Ms. Susan Bailey
Defendant:
COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
QUILES v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
as 5:2024cv01531
Plaintiff:
YAZMIN QUILES
Defendant:
COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
