US District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania Other Statutes Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 10
HARRIS v. HOWER
as 2:2021cv02998
Plaintiff:
RICHARD M. HARRIS
Defendant:
AGENT MATTHEW HOWER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
GRAY v. CITY OF LANCASTER et al
as 5:2018cv04578
Defendant:
CITY OF LANCASTER, OFFICER TIMOTHY SINNOT and OFFICER JAKE BINGHAM
Plaintiff:
RONALD BRIAN GRAY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
HEIBA v. SAVE A LOT FOOD STORES et al
as 2:2017cv04569
Plaintiff:
SAMAH HEIBA
Defendant:
SAVE A LOT FOOD STORES , SAVE A LOT HOLDINGS, INC. , SUPERVALU INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
MARCANO v. MORAN FOODS, LLC et al
as 2:2017cv04517
Plaintiff:
JULIETTE MARCANO
Defendant:
MORAN FOODS, LLC , MORAN FOODS, INC. and SAVE-A-LOT
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
WATKINS v. WALGREENS et al
as 2:2017cv04448
Plaintiff:
ALEXANDRA WATKINS
Defendant:
WALGREENS and WALGREEN EASTERN CO., INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
HOGAN v. SAVE-A-LOT FOOD STORES et al
as 2:2017cv04229
Plaintiff:
ELLA HOGAN
Defendant:
SAVE-A-LOT FOOD STORES , SAVE-A-LOT HOLDINGS, INC. , SUPERVALU INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446
WILLIAMS v. WALGREENS et al
as 2:2017cv03803
Plaintiff:
JANETTE WILLIAMS
Defendant:
WALGREENS and WALGREENS DRUG STORES, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
GREENLEAF ENTERPRISES v. EI DUPONT DE NEMOURS AND COMPANY
as 2:2013cv05122
Plaintiff:
GREENLEAF ENTERPRISES
Defendant:
EI DUPONT DE NEMOURS AND COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
CAMPBELL et al v. EI DUPONT DE NEMOURS AND COMPANY
as 2:2013cv05121
Plaintiff:
MARION CAMPBELL , HANS KUHNI , ROBYN SORENSON and others
Defendant:
EI DUPONT DE NEMOURS AND COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
KARETAS FOODS, INC. v. CAL-MAINE FOODS INC. et al
as 5:2008cv04950
Plaintiff:
KARETAS FOODS, INC.
Defendant:
CAL-MAINE FOODS INC., MICHAEL FOODS INC., MOARK LLC and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
