US District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania Other Statutes Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 104
AAMCO TRANSMISSIONS, LLC, f/k/a/ AAMCO TRANSMISSIONS, INC. v. BELL, JR.
as 2:2024cv01357
Petitioner:
AAMCO TRANSMISSIONS, LLC, f/k/a/ AAMCO TRANSMISSIONS, INC.
Respondent:
BILL BELL, JR.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
STEVENSON v. CITY OF PHILADELPHIA
as 2:2024cv00995
Plaintiff:
JOSEPH STEVENSON
Defendant:
CITY OF PHILADELPHIA
Woodbury Financial Services, Inc. v. Joseph Michael Cucinotta SR., et. al.
as 2:2024cv00541
Plaintiff:
Woodbury Financial Services, Inc.
Defendant:
Joseph Michael Cucinotta SR. and Joseph Michael Cucinotta JR.
CUKER et al v. BEREZOFSKY
as 2:2024cv00471
Petitioner:
MARK R. CUKER and GERALD J. WILLIAMS
Respondent:
ESTHER E. BEREZOFSKY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
PPL ELECTRIC UTILITIES et al v. IBEW LOCAL 1600
as 5:2024cv00072
Plaintiff:
PPL ELECTRIC UTILITIES and PPL SERVICES CORPORATION
Defendant:
IBEW LOCAL 1600
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 185 Labor/Mgt. Relations (Contracts)
CENTURY INDEMNITY COMPANY v. AXA SEGUROS, S.A. DE C.V.
as 2:2023cv05027
Petitioner:
CENTURY INDEMNITY COMPANY
Respondent:
AXA SEGUROS, S.A. DE C.V.
Cause Of Action: 09 U.S.C. § 1 U.S. Arbitration Act
AAMCO TRANSMISSIONS, LLC v. OLSON
as 2:2023cv03862
Plaintiff:
AAMCO TRANSMISSIONS, LLC
Defendant:
JAMES OLSON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
UBER TECHNOLOGIES, INC. v. BODDIE
as 2:2023cv03780
Plaintiff:
UBER TECHNOLOGIES, INC.
Defendant:
KEVIN BODDIE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 185 Suit to Compel Arbitration
Choice Hotels International , Inc. et al v. Jai Sai Baba, LLC et al
as 2:2023cv03360
Petitioner:
Choice Hotels International, Inc. and Choice Hotels Owners Council
Respondent:
Jai Sai Baba LLC, Dipesh Patel and MDPD13 Investments, LLC
Cause Of Action: 09 U.S.C. § 0207
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
