US District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania Other Statutes Cases
Cases 71 - 80 of 19,403
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00937
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
HARRISON-EL v. DR. DOE et al
as 2:2023cv04725
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
HARRISON-EL v. PENGLASE et al
as 2:2023cv04726
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
THEODORE v. PURECYCLE TECHNOLOGIES, INC. et al
as 2:2024mc00011
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM C. THEODORE
Defendant:
PURECYCLE TECHNOLOGIES, INC., MICHAEL OTWORTH, MICHAEL E. DEE and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00891
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00893
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2024cv00883
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
JOE HAND PROMOTIONS, INC. v. GJELI et al
as 2:2024cv00881
Plaintiff:
JOE HAND PROMOTIONS, INC.
Defendant:
LUAN GJELI, TIERA D. GORDON, TAUSHA D. MCDANIEL Individually, and as officers, directors, shareholders and/or principals of TD 7016 FRANKFORD INC d/b/a SPIKED LOUNGE and others
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 553 U.S.C.A. Cable Communications Policy Act
NEWBROUGH et al v. TRANS UNION, LLC
as 2:2024cv00889
Plaintiff:
SKYLER MCKINLEY NEWBROUGH and SAYLOR MACKENZIE NEWBROUGH
Defendant:
TRANS UNION, LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
PARK v. PHILADELPHIA CREDIT UNION
as 2:2024cv00896
Plaintiff:
PHOEBE PARK
Defendant:
PHILADELPHIA CREDIT UNION
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
